Environmental Impact Assessment of the Soyuz-2.1a Launch Vehicle with the Progress MS-29 Cargo Spacecraft in Kazakhstan: A One-Time Monitoring with Retrospective Comparison of Data from 2020–2023

The relevance of this study is determined by the need for a scientifically grounded assessment of environmental risks associated with rocket launches and by the necessity of ensuring environmental safety in areas potentially affected by space activities. Comprehensive monitoring of rocket-stage impact zones and adjacent populated areas is especially important because pollutant distribution depends on natural, climatic, and spatial factors. This study assesses the environmental impact of the “Soyuz-2.1a” launch with the “Progress MS-29” cargo spacecraft in Kazakhstan using integrated field monitoring, laboratory analysis, and geoinformation methods. The work should be interpreted as a single-event environmental monitoring assessment, while historical monitoring data from 2020–2023 were used only as a retrospective comparative background for the U-25 impact area and were not included in the main BACI statistical analysis. The study covered the launch site, adjacent populated areas, and the U-25 stage impact zone. A before–after control-impact (BACI) design with distance stratification and consideration of wind direction was applied to identify post-launch changes. Measurements below the limit of detection and limit of quantification were processed using censored-data methods, including Regression on Order Statistics (ROS) and the Kaplan–Meier estimator. Spatial analysis was used to generate concentration fields, contour maps, and risk zones, revealing an anisotropic distribution of environmental stress in the downwind sector. An integrated hazard quotient (HQ) metric was applied to compare air, water, and soil conditions on a unified scale. The results indicate that the post-launch impact was localized and time-limited, with the greatest sensitivity observed in the soil component of the U-25 zone during the early post-launch period. Atmospheric air and water indicators remained within regulatory limits in populated areas. The proposed approach combines BACI monitoring, censored-data analysis, spatial modeling, and GIS-based visualization, providing a reproducible framework for the environmental assessment of rocket-stage impact areas. The practical recommendations include staged post-launch monitoring, temporary restriction of access to high-stress zones, primary reclamation of contaminated soil, and the use of WebGIS tools to support environmental decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17060532
Primary Topic
Space exploration and regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Impact Assessment of the Soyuz-2.1a Launch Vehicle with the Progress MS-29 Cargo Spacecraft in Kazakhstan: A One-Time Monitoring with Retrospective Comparison of Data from 2020–2023

Анар Утегенова, Айнур Козбакова, Serik Daruish, Aliya Kalizhanova et al.
Atmosphere
Space exploration and regulation
article

Environmental Impact Assessment of the Soyuz-2.1a Launch Vehicle with the Progress MS-29 Cargo Spacecraft in Kazakhstan: A One-Time Monitoring with Retrospective Comparison of Data from 2020–2023

Анар Утегенова, Айнур Козбакова, Serik Daruish, Aliya Kalizhanova, Murat Kunelbayev
article en

Abstract

The relevance of this study is determined by the need for a scientifically grounded assessment of environmental risks associated with rocket launches and by the necessity of ensuring environmental safety in areas potentially affected by space activities. Comprehensive monitoring of rocket-stage impact zones and adjacent populated areas is especially important because pollutant distribution depends on natural, climatic, and spatial factors. This study assesses the environmental impact of the “Soyuz-2.1a” launch with the “Progress MS-29” cargo spacecraft in Kazakhstan using integrated field monitoring, laboratory analysis, and geoinformation methods. The work should be interpreted as a single-event environmental monitoring assessment, while historical monitoring data from 2020–2023 were used only as a retrospective comparative background for the U-25 impact area and were not included in the main BACI statistical analysis. The study covered the launch site, adjacent populated areas, and the U-25 stage impact zone. A before–after control-impact (BACI) design with distance stratification and consideration of wind direction was applied to identify post-launch changes. Measurements below the limit of detection and limit of quantification were processed using censored-data methods, including Regression on Order Statistics (ROS) and the Kaplan–Meier estimator. Spatial analysis was used to generate concentration fields, contour maps, and risk zones, revealing an anisotropic distribution of environmental stress in the downwind sector. An integrated hazard quotient (HQ) metric was applied to compare air, water, and soil conditions on a unified scale. The results indicate that the post-launch impact was localized and time-limited, with the greatest sensitivity observed in the soil component of the U-25 zone during the early post-launch period. Atmospheric air and water indicators remained within regulatory limits in populated areas. The proposed approach combines BACI monitoring, censored-data analysis, spatial modeling, and GIS-based visualization, providing a reproducible framework for the environmental assessment of rocket-stage impact areas. The practical recommendations include staged post-launch monitoring, temporary restriction of access to high-stress zones, primary reclamation of contaminated soil, and the use of WebGIS tools to support environmental decision-making.

AtmosphereVol. 17(6)
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ), Institute of Information and Computational Technologies (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Space exploration and regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.