Paroxetine versus placebo for the management of vasomotor symptoms in surgical menopause: A pilot double‐blind randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose paroxetine (20 mg/day) compared with placebo for managing vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in women with surgical menopause. METHODS: This was a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at the Instituto Hondureño de Seguridad Social (IHSS), Tegucigalpa, Honduras, from January 30 to July 31, 2025. Women aged <48 years, within 6 months of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and experiencing moderate-to-severe VMS (≥ 7 episodes/week) were eligible. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive paroxetine 20 mg/day or matching placebo (folic acid 5 mg) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in total Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) score. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (SF-36) and adverse events. Analysis followed the per-protocol approach, with intention-to-treat sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Of 150 women assessed, 90 were randomized. A total of 47 women in the paroxetine group and 43 in the placebo group completed follow-up and were analyzed. At 12 weeks, the paroxetine group showed greater reduction in total MRS score compared with placebo (mean 16.9 ± 7.7 vs. 22.6 ± 6.1; mean difference -5.7, 95% CI -8.6 to -2.8; P < 0.001). SF-36 scores also improved more with paroxetine (91.0 ± 6.4 vs. 86.9 ± 4.8; mean difference 4.1, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.5; P = 0.001). Adverse events (headache, fatigue, drowsiness) were more frequent with paroxetine but mild and transient; no serious events occurred. The dropout rate was 14.4% (13/90), and intention-to-treat analysis showed consistent findings with slightly attenuated effect sizes. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, paroxetine 20 mg/day showed promise in reducing VMS and improving quality of life in Honduran women with surgical menopause, with acceptable tolerability. The high attrition rate underscores the need for larger trials to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.71093
Primary Topic
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paroxetine versus placebo for the management of vasomotor symptoms in surgical menopause: A pilot double‐blind randomized clinical trial

Ricardo Arturo Gutierrez-Ramirez, Rubí Emelda Bu Urbina, Arnold Reinieri Cambar‐González, Alejandra Paola Romero Huete et al.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
article

Paroxetine versus placebo for the management of vasomotor symptoms in surgical menopause: A pilot double‐blind randomized clinical trial

Ricardo Arturo Gutierrez-Ramirez, Rubí Emelda Bu Urbina, Arnold Reinieri Cambar‐González, Alejandra Paola Romero Huete, Heisell Gabriela Álvarez Castro
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose paroxetine (20 mg/day) compared with placebo for managing vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in women with surgical menopause. METHODS: This was a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at the Instituto Hondureño de Seguridad Social (IHSS), Tegucigalpa, Honduras, from January 30 to July 31, 2025. Women aged <48 years, within 6 months of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and experiencing moderate-to-severe VMS (≥ 7 episodes/week) were eligible. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive paroxetine 20 mg/day or matching placebo (folic acid 5 mg) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in total Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) score. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (SF-36) and adverse events. Analysis followed the per-protocol approach, with intention-to-treat sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Of 150 women assessed, 90 were randomized. A total of 47 women in the paroxetine group and 43 in the placebo group completed follow-up and were analyzed. At 12 weeks, the paroxetine group showed greater reduction in total MRS score compared with placebo (mean 16.9 ± 7.7 vs. 22.6 ± 6.1; mean difference -5.7, 95% CI -8.6 to -2.8; P < 0.001). SF-36 scores also improved more with paroxetine (91.0 ± 6.4 vs. 86.9 ± 4.8; mean difference 4.1, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.5; P = 0.001). Adverse events (headache, fatigue, drowsiness) were more frequent with paroxetine but mild and transient; no serious events occurred. The dropout rate was 14.4% (13/90), and intention-to-treat analysis showed consistent findings with slightly attenuated effect sizes. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, paroxetine 20 mg/day showed promise in reducing VMS and improving quality of life in Honduran women with surgical menopause, with acceptable tolerability. The high attrition rate underscores the need for larger trials to confirm these findings.

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Universidad Metropolitana de Honduras (HN), National Autonomous University of Honduras (HN), Honduras Foundation for Agricultural Research (HN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.