Development and Validation of the Distress Disclosure Risk Scale: Assessing the Perceived Social and Relational Vulnerabilities in Communicating One’s Troubles

Despite decades of research on distress disclosure, existing scales inadequately capture the multifaceted nature of perceived disclosure risks, particularly in collectivist cultural contexts where concerns extend beyond the individual to family and relational obligations. This research proposes a scale that more fully addresses the social and relational vulnerabilities specific to distress disclosure. Three studies with Chinese adults (n = 1728) were conducted to establish and validate the 16-item multidimensional Distress Disclosure Risk Scale (DDRS-16), comprising three dimensions of perceived risk of distress disclosure: social judgment, disclosure vulnerability, and imposition. Incorporating collectivist values, the DDRS-16 offers a more nuanced understanding of the dynamics of distress disclosure overlooked in existing scales developed exclusively from Western samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075261454433
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of the Distress Disclosure Risk Scale: Assessing the Perceived Social and Relational Vulnerabilities in Communicating One’s Troubles

Tsz Hang Chu
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Development and Validation of the Distress Disclosure Risk Scale: Assessing the Perceived Social and Relational Vulnerabilities in Communicating One’s Troubles

Tsz Hang Chu
article en

Abstract

Despite decades of research on distress disclosure, existing scales inadequately capture the multifaceted nature of perceived disclosure risks, particularly in collectivist cultural contexts where concerns extend beyond the individual to family and relational obligations. This research proposes a scale that more fully addresses the social and relational vulnerabilities specific to distress disclosure. Three studies with Chinese adults (n = 1728) were conducted to establish and validate the 16-item multidimensional Distress Disclosure Risk Scale (DDRS-16), comprising three dimensions of perceived risk of distress disclosure: social judgment, disclosure vulnerability, and imposition. Incorporating collectivist values, the DDRS-16 offers a more nuanced understanding of the dynamics of distress disclosure overlooked in existing scales developed exclusively from Western samples.

Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.