SGCI Gender and Inclusivity Initiative, Tanzania:reflections on the journey

Khadija Malima (left), Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) and Hildegalda Prosper Mushi (right), Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) If the aim of good research is to solve the problems of society, particularly its disadvantaged members and the most disadvantaged people in society tend to be women, why is it that most funding for research goes to male researchers? This question was posed in this interview by Khadija and Hildegalda, members of the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) change team who participated in the Gender Action Learning process led by Gender at Work. According to Khadija, having good national research and gender policies is not enough: more interaction with grassroots communities is needed to ensure that research is informed from the bottom up, by those who live with pressing challenges. "We have the policies, we have a president who is a woman, but it is not good enough. There are so many other things. There's a cultur... and we know behaviour change is very complicated." According to Hildegalda, the peer learning process of the G&I has provided participants with tools to reflect and to question your own position, but also to ask "tough questions" as a council about how it is running its affairs. "A seed has been planted and we are not going to let it die."

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/32363415
Primary Topic
Gender, Education, and Development Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SGCI Gender and Inclusivity Initiative, Tanzania:reflections on the journey

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Gender, Education, and Development Issues
article

SGCI Gender and Inclusivity Initiative, Tanzania:reflections on the journey

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

Khadija Malima (left), Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) and Hildegalda Prosper Mushi (right), Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) If the aim of good research is to solve the problems of society, particularly its disadvantaged members and the most disadvantaged people in society tend to be women, why is it that most funding for research goes to male researchers? This question was posed in this interview by Khadija and Hildegalda, members of the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH) change team who participated in the Gender Action Learning process led by Gender at Work. According to Khadija, having good national research and gender policies is not enough: more interaction with grassroots communities is needed to ensure that research is informed from the bottom up, by those who live with pressing challenges. "We have the policies, we have a president who is a woman, but it is not good enough. There are so many other things. There's a cultur... and we know behaviour change is very complicated." According to Hildegalda, the peer learning process of the G&I has provided participants with tools to reflect and to question your own position, but also to ask "tough questions" as a council about how it is running its affairs. "A seed has been planted and we are not going to let it die."

Human Science Research Council SA
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Gender, Education, and Development Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.