Air Travel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes or Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Guidance and Gaps

BACKGROUND: As more people live with cardiovascular disease, commercial flights increasingly include patients recovering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or living with heart failure (HF), who face unique physiological and logistical challenges due to hypobaric hypoxia, reduced pressure, prolonged immobility, and limited onboard medical resources. METHODS: We reviewed current guidelines, observational studies, and registry data to synthesize evidence and define major gaps regarding air travel in patients with ACS or HF. RESULTS: Available data although derived from small, heterogeneous cohorts and different therapeutic eras, suggest that many clinically stable patients after ACS and those with compensated HF (New York Heart Association classes I-III) can generally fly with low short-term event rates when appropriately assessed. The risk may be higher in the very early post-discharge period, with the magnitude of this excess risk remaining poorly defined. No universally accepted waiting period after ACS or HF decompensation is recommended by guidelines although they broadly concordant in emphasizing clinical stability, euvolemia and absence of ongoing ischemia prerequisites for travel, yet these recommendations have not been validated against in-flight outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial air travel is likely safe for patients with ACS or HF who are clinically stable, but decisions should be individualized and incorporate both patient- and flight-specific factors. Substantial evidence gaps persist, particularly regarding optimal timing after ACS or HF decompensation and the development of aviation-specific risk models. Prospective cohorts and international registries integrating contemporary clinical, airline, and in-flight medical event data are needed to refine guidance and support patient mobility without compromising safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcag085
Primary Topic
Travel-related health issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Air Travel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes or Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Guidance and Gaps

D R Mpenetou, G Filippatos, D Delialis, S Vrikos et al.
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
Travel-related health issues
article

Air Travel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes or Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Guidance and Gaps

D R Mpenetou, G Filippatos, D Delialis, S Vrikos, K Katogiannis, G Georgiopoulos
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As more people live with cardiovascular disease, commercial flights increasingly include patients recovering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or living with heart failure (HF), who face unique physiological and logistical challenges due to hypobaric hypoxia, reduced pressure, prolonged immobility, and limited onboard medical resources. METHODS: We reviewed current guidelines, observational studies, and registry data to synthesize evidence and define major gaps regarding air travel in patients with ACS or HF. RESULTS: Available data although derived from small, heterogeneous cohorts and different therapeutic eras, suggest that many clinically stable patients after ACS and those with compensated HF (New York Heart Association classes I-III) can generally fly with low short-term event rates when appropriately assessed. The risk may be higher in the very early post-discharge period, with the magnitude of this excess risk remaining poorly defined. No universally accepted waiting period after ACS or HF decompensation is recommended by guidelines although they broadly concordant in emphasizing clinical stability, euvolemia and absence of ongoing ischemia prerequisites for travel, yet these recommendations have not been validated against in-flight outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial air travel is likely safe for patients with ACS or HF who are clinically stable, but decisions should be individualized and incorporate both patient- and flight-specific factors. Substantial evidence gaps persist, particularly regarding optimal timing after ACS or HF decompensation and the development of aviation-specific risk models. Prospective cohorts and international registries integrating contemporary clinical, airline, and in-flight medical event data are needed to refine guidance and support patient mobility without compromising safety.

European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
King's College London (GB), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Travel-related health issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.