Engaging individuals in digital health research panels: A qualitative study including participants in vulnerable positions

Individuals in vulnerable circumstances often face challenges in accessing and utilizing digital health tools. They are also underrepresented in digital health research. Consequently, digital health tools may not be aligned with their specific needs and requirements, potentially intensifying health disparities. A research panel especially involving individuals in a vulnerable position could increase their representation in digital health research. This study examined motivation, facilitators and barriers, and prerequisites for initial participation and sustained involvement in a panel for digital health research. We conducted 23 semi-structured interviews with mainly individuals in vulnerable positions. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, coded and thematically analysed. The results indicated that most participants were motivated for engagement in a research panel on digital health. They aspired to contribute to the accessibility and usability of digital health, thereby benefiting not only themselves but also their peers. Additional motivations were to stay informed and to learn from developments in the field. Participants perceived recruitment efforts in community centres or the distribution of inclusively designed flyers as the most effective methods. Clear communication and timely feedback of results emerged as the most significant factors in sustaining long-term enthusiasm for panel participation. As the study was conducted in the Dutch context, cultural and contextual factors may limit the generalisability of the results to other settings. Nonetheless, by fostering intrinsic motivation, tailoring recruitment approaches, and addressing practical barriers, research panels can facilitate meaningful participation and contribute to the equitable development of digital health interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001443
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging individuals in digital health research panels: A qualitative study including participants in vulnerable positions

Marloes E. Derksen, Mirjam P. Fransen, Corine Oldhoff-Nuijsink, Jeanine Suurmond et al.
PLOS Digital Health
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Engaging individuals in digital health research panels: A qualitative study including participants in vulnerable positions

Marloes E. Derksen, Mirjam P. Fransen, Corine Oldhoff-Nuijsink, Jeanine Suurmond, Linda W.P. Peute
article en

Abstract

Individuals in vulnerable circumstances often face challenges in accessing and utilizing digital health tools. They are also underrepresented in digital health research. Consequently, digital health tools may not be aligned with their specific needs and requirements, potentially intensifying health disparities. A research panel especially involving individuals in a vulnerable position could increase their representation in digital health research. This study examined motivation, facilitators and barriers, and prerequisites for initial participation and sustained involvement in a panel for digital health research. We conducted 23 semi-structured interviews with mainly individuals in vulnerable positions. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, coded and thematically analysed. The results indicated that most participants were motivated for engagement in a research panel on digital health. They aspired to contribute to the accessibility and usability of digital health, thereby benefiting not only themselves but also their peers. Additional motivations were to stay informed and to learn from developments in the field. Participants perceived recruitment efforts in community centres or the distribution of inclusively designed flyers as the most effective methods. Clear communication and timely feedback of results emerged as the most significant factors in sustaining long-term enthusiasm for panel participation. As the study was conducted in the Dutch context, cultural and contextual factors may limit the generalisability of the results to other settings. Nonetheless, by fostering intrinsic motivation, tailoring recruitment approaches, and addressing practical barriers, research panels can facilitate meaningful participation and contribute to the equitable development of digital health interventions.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 5(5)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.