Beyond Data and Models: Toward an African Cognitive Sovereignty

Between July 2024 and May 2026, a continental conversation on artificial intelligence consolidated across Africa. The African Union adopted a Continental AI Strategy. African states meeting at the Global AI Summit on Africa endorsed the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence in Kigali. The AU High-Level Policy Dialogue convened in Addis Ababa with heads of state and continental commissioners. Researchers at the ILINA Program and the African Hub on AI Safety, Peace and Security at the University of Cape Town proposed an Africa-centric framework for AI safety evaluations. African technology leaders and regulators launched the REST-AI Governance Framework in Abuja. Three sovereignty vocabularies circulate through these texts: data, AI, digital. A fourth, narrative, has emerged in cultural and policy debate. Each is necessary. None is sufficient. This paper introduces a fifth, conceptually upstream layer: cognitive sovereignty. It is defined as the capacity of a political community to produce, validate, and circulate the categories from which it understands itself, particularly when AI becomes the dominant medium of categorial production. The paper articulates three operational implications (for public policy, universities, and creative industries) and proposes a single legible criterion for evaluating Africa-Europe AI cooperation: its capacity to expand, rather than narrow, the cognitive sovereignty of the African interlocutor. The argument advanced here is neither Chinese-style autarky nor American-style hegemony. It is a third option: a continent that produces the categories from which it negotiates its place. — v2.0 (22 May 2026) — English working paper. Adapted, not literally translated, from the French v1.2 (May 2026). Integrates the institutional and academic record of the African AI conversation: AU Continental AI Strategy (July 2024), Africa Declaration on AI (Kigali, 4 April 2025), AU High-Level Policy Dialogue (Addis Ababa, 17 May 2025), Ireri et al. (2026) on Africa-centric AI safety evaluations, and the REST-AI Governance Framework (Abuja, 30 April 2026). The francophone bibliographic lineage (Stiegler, Mhalla, Garno) is preserved in a dedicated note. This working paper is part of the research activity of CERHCA (Cercle d'Études et de Recherche des Humanités et Cultures Africaines, French law 1901 association, WALDEC W452019663), whose vocation is to explore African humanities and cultures, including the political and conceptual dimensions of artificial intelligence on the continent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20341001
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Data and Models: Toward an African Cognitive Sovereignty

Béatrice ODUNLAMI
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Beyond Data and Models: Toward an African Cognitive Sovereignty

Béatrice ODUNLAMI
article en

Abstract

Between July 2024 and May 2026, a continental conversation on artificial intelligence consolidated across Africa. The African Union adopted a Continental AI Strategy. African states meeting at the Global AI Summit on Africa endorsed the Africa Declaration on Artificial Intelligence in Kigali. The AU High-Level Policy Dialogue convened in Addis Ababa with heads of state and continental commissioners. Researchers at the ILINA Program and the African Hub on AI Safety, Peace and Security at the University of Cape Town proposed an Africa-centric framework for AI safety evaluations. African technology leaders and regulators launched the REST-AI Governance Framework in Abuja. Three sovereignty vocabularies circulate through these texts: data, AI, digital. A fourth, narrative, has emerged in cultural and policy debate. Each is necessary. None is sufficient. This paper introduces a fifth, conceptually upstream layer: cognitive sovereignty. It is defined as the capacity of a political community to produce, validate, and circulate the categories from which it understands itself, particularly when AI becomes the dominant medium of categorial production. The paper articulates three operational implications (for public policy, universities, and creative industries) and proposes a single legible criterion for evaluating Africa-Europe AI cooperation: its capacity to expand, rather than narrow, the cognitive sovereignty of the African interlocutor. The argument advanced here is neither Chinese-style autarky nor American-style hegemony. It is a third option: a continent that produces the categories from which it negotiates its place. — v2.0 (22 May 2026) — English working paper. Adapted, not literally translated, from the French v1.2 (May 2026). Integrates the institutional and academic record of the African AI conversation: AU Continental AI Strategy (July 2024), Africa Declaration on AI (Kigali, 4 April 2025), AU High-Level Policy Dialogue (Addis Ababa, 17 May 2025), Ireri et al. (2026) on Africa-centric AI safety evaluations, and the REST-AI Governance Framework (Abuja, 30 April 2026). The francophone bibliographic lineage (Stiegler, Mhalla, Garno) is preserved in a dedicated note. This working paper is part of the research activity of CERHCA (Cercle d'Études et de Recherche des Humanités et Cultures Africaines, French law 1901 association, WALDEC W452019663), whose vocation is to explore African humanities and cultures, including the political and conceptual dimensions of artificial intelligence on the continent.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur les Qualifications (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.