A unified framework for characterizing response quality in surveys with multi-item scales

Self-administered surveys are widely used but the quality of the survey responses have been a major concern. Low-quality responses threaten the validity and replicability of studies. To detect potentially problematic responses, many data quality indicators have been proposed. We propose a unifying conceptual framework for response quality issues in multi-item surveys as literature is scattered and suffers from a lack of conceptual and terminological clarity. The tripartite framework makes distinction between (1) response styles, (2) insufficient effort responding, and (3) response manipulation and delineates the relationship between different response quality indicators and the response quality issue(s) they measure. The framework provides a common theoretical point of reference and unified terminology for future work on response quality. This Perspective offers a conceptual framework for response quality issues in multi-item surveys and how to handle these. It distinguishes between (1) response styles, (2) insufficient effort responding, and (3) response manipulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Psychology
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00463-2
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A unified framework for characterizing response quality in surveys with multi-item scales

Nivedita Bhaktha, Henning Silber, Clemens M. Lechner
Communications Psychology
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

A unified framework for characterizing response quality in surveys with multi-item scales

Nivedita Bhaktha, Henning Silber, Clemens M. Lechner
article en

Abstract

Self-administered surveys are widely used but the quality of the survey responses have been a major concern. Low-quality responses threaten the validity and replicability of studies. To detect potentially problematic responses, many data quality indicators have been proposed. We propose a unifying conceptual framework for response quality issues in multi-item surveys as literature is scattered and suffers from a lack of conceptual and terminological clarity. The tripartite framework makes distinction between (1) response styles, (2) insufficient effort responding, and (3) response manipulation and delineates the relationship between different response quality indicators and the response quality issue(s) they measure. The framework provides a common theoretical point of reference and unified terminology for future work on response quality. This Perspective offers a conceptual framework for response quality issues in multi-item surveys and how to handle these. It distinguishes between (1) response styles, (2) insufficient effort responding, and (3) response manipulation.

Communications PsychologyVol. 4(1)
University of Michigan (US), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE), Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IN)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.