A prospective, multi-site, observational study assessing the treatment thresholds of new onset atrial fibrillation in the critically ill

Objective To define haemodynamic thresholds for pharmacological treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in critically ill patients and examine associations with short-term outcomes including reversion to sinus rhythm and in-hospital mortality. Design, setting, and participants prospective multicentre observational cohort study conducted across six Australian intensive care units (ICUs) from December 2024 to September 2025. Adult patients (≥18 years) who developed NOAF during ICU admission were included. A Cox proportional hazards model treating time to treatment as a time-dependent covariate was used to assess associations between pharmacological therapy and secondary outcomes. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was heart rate at initiation of the first pharmacological therapy for NOAF. Secondary outcomes included mean arterial pressure at time of treatment, reversion to sinus rhythm, haemodynamic deterioration, ICU length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Results Four hundred eighty-two patients were screened for eligibility and 210 met the inclusion criteria. One hundred fifty-four (73.3%) received pharmacological treatment for NOAF. The median heart rate at treatment initiation was 128 beats per minute (interquartile range [IQR]: 113-147) and median mean arterial pressure 76 mmHg (IQR: 70-87). Pharmacological treatment was not independently associated with sustained reversion to sinus rhythm (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-2.20) or in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.36-2.58). Pharmacological treatment was associated with prolonged ICU stay (multiplicative adjusted effect: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.06-1.82). Conclusions Pharmacological treatment for NOAF is typically initiated at heart rates approximating 130 bpm. After accounting for time-dependent exposure, pharmacological treatment was not independently associated with reversion to sustained sinus rhythm. Given the methodological limitations encountered, these findings warrant validation in randomised trials to better define optimal treatment strategies for NOAF in critical illness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccrj.2026.100188
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prospective, multi-site, observational study assessing the treatment thresholds of new onset atrial fibrillation in the critically ill

A. Brown, P. Emerson, M. Fogarty, T. Evans et al.
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

A prospective, multi-site, observational study assessing the treatment thresholds of new onset atrial fibrillation in the critically ill

A. Brown, P. Emerson, M. Fogarty, T. Evans, K.J. Denny, N.P. Anthony, J. Walker, H.G.M. Walker, J. Reeve, J. Holmes, C. McDermott
article en

Abstract

Objective To define haemodynamic thresholds for pharmacological treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in critically ill patients and examine associations with short-term outcomes including reversion to sinus rhythm and in-hospital mortality. Design, setting, and participants prospective multicentre observational cohort study conducted across six Australian intensive care units (ICUs) from December 2024 to September 2025. Adult patients (≥18 years) who developed NOAF during ICU admission were included. A Cox proportional hazards model treating time to treatment as a time-dependent covariate was used to assess associations between pharmacological therapy and secondary outcomes. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was heart rate at initiation of the first pharmacological therapy for NOAF. Secondary outcomes included mean arterial pressure at time of treatment, reversion to sinus rhythm, haemodynamic deterioration, ICU length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Results Four hundred eighty-two patients were screened for eligibility and 210 met the inclusion criteria. One hundred fifty-four (73.3%) received pharmacological treatment for NOAF. The median heart rate at treatment initiation was 128 beats per minute (interquartile range [IQR]: 113-147) and median mean arterial pressure 76 mmHg (IQR: 70-87). Pharmacological treatment was not independently associated with sustained reversion to sinus rhythm (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-2.20) or in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.36-2.58). Pharmacological treatment was associated with prolonged ICU stay (multiplicative adjusted effect: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.06-1.82). Conclusions Pharmacological treatment for NOAF is typically initiated at heart rates approximating 130 bpm. After accounting for time-dependent exposure, pharmacological treatment was not independently associated with reversion to sustained sinus rhythm. Given the methodological limitations encountered, these findings warrant validation in randomised trials to better define optimal treatment strategies for NOAF in critical illness.

Critical Care and ResuscitationVol. 28(2)
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), Epworth Hospital (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU), Austin Hospital (AU), Fiona Stanley Hospital (AU), St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), Bendigo Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.