The comparative effectiveness of psychological interventions for health anxiety: systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Health anxiety, characterised by excessive worry about having or acquiring a serious illness, significantly impacts mental health and well-being. Determining which psychological interventions and components should be considered as first-line treatments requires robust evidence. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various psychological interventions and their essential components in managing health anxiety. METHOD: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple academic databases, including PubMed, Embase, PsyINFO, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with updates until 16 January 2025. Randomised clinical trials investigating the efficacy of psychological interventions among adults with substantial levels of health anxiety were included. We employed random-effects network meta-analysis for treatment comparison, and component network meta-analysis to assess the impacts of key therapeutic elements. RESULTS: A total of 35 trials involving 3263 participants (67% female; mean age 37 years, s.d. = 6) were analysed. The results revealed significant effects for several therapies, including cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), exposure therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, metacognitive therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, as well as behavioural stress management, compared with a waiting list control. However, cognitive bias modification, imagery therapy and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy did not show significant effects. Component analysis indicated that exposure and response prevention, cognitive restructuring and mindfulness were linked to improved treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Both CBT and third-wave CBT are reasonable first-line choices for managing health anxiety. Effective CBT packages for health anxiety should integrate key components such as exposure and response prevention, cognitive restructuring and mindfulness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2026.10647
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The comparative effectiveness of psychological interventions for health anxiety: systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Congrong Shi, Yi Lu, Erland Axelsson, Lizu Lai et al.
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

The comparative effectiveness of psychological interventions for health anxiety: systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Congrong Shi, Yi Lu, Erland Axelsson, Lizu Lai, Y LI, Ying Liu, Peter Tyrer, Zhihong Ren
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health anxiety, characterised by excessive worry about having or acquiring a serious illness, significantly impacts mental health and well-being. Determining which psychological interventions and components should be considered as first-line treatments requires robust evidence. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various psychological interventions and their essential components in managing health anxiety. METHOD: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple academic databases, including PubMed, Embase, PsyINFO, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with updates until 16 January 2025. Randomised clinical trials investigating the efficacy of psychological interventions among adults with substantial levels of health anxiety were included. We employed random-effects network meta-analysis for treatment comparison, and component network meta-analysis to assess the impacts of key therapeutic elements. RESULTS: A total of 35 trials involving 3263 participants (67% female; mean age 37 years, s.d. = 6) were analysed. The results revealed significant effects for several therapies, including cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), exposure therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, metacognitive therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, as well as behavioural stress management, compared with a waiting list control. However, cognitive bias modification, imagery therapy and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy did not show significant effects. Component analysis indicated that exposure and response prevention, cognitive restructuring and mindfulness were linked to improved treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Both CBT and third-wave CBT are reasonable first-line choices for managing health anxiety. Effective CBT packages for health anxiety should integrate key components such as exposure and response prevention, cognitive restructuring and mindfulness.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
University of Macau (MO), Hubei University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Central China Normal University (CN), Anhui Normal University (CN), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.