Time Preferences, Informal Work and Time Poverty in Ghana

ABSTRACT Time poverty is an increasingly important dimension of welfare in developing countries, where individuals often combine long hours of paid and unpaid work under conditions of economic uncertainty. While existing studies have identified several structural determinants of time poverty, relatively little is known about the role of behavioural factors such as subjective time preferences. This study examines the relationship between subjective time preferences and time poverty in Ghana, with a particular focus on the mediating roles of committed time in informal work and consumption‐based welfare. Using data from the seventh round of the Ghana Living Standards Survey (GLSS 7) and an instrumental variable mediation framework to address potential endogeneity, we find that households headed by more impatient individuals are 3% less likely to be associated with time poverty. Decomposing this association reveals that adjustments in committed time in informal work are the dominant mediating channel, accounting for a substantial share of the total effect. The finding suggests that impatience can reduce time poverty by limiting prolonged engagement in time‐intensive informal activities. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the negative association between impatient household heads and time poverty is stronger among males, adults, urban residents and noninsured households. The results highlight the importance of incorporating behavioural preferences into analyses of time poverty and point to policies that improve work quality, welfare and labour market stability as key levers for reducing excessive time burdens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Development
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.70089
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time Preferences, Informal Work and Time Poverty in Ghana

Francis Addeah Darko, Prince M. Etwire, Edward Martey, Kwabena Krah
Journal of International Development
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
article

Time Preferences, Informal Work and Time Poverty in Ghana

Francis Addeah Darko, Prince M. Etwire, Edward Martey, Kwabena Krah
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Time poverty is an increasingly important dimension of welfare in developing countries, where individuals often combine long hours of paid and unpaid work under conditions of economic uncertainty. While existing studies have identified several structural determinants of time poverty, relatively little is known about the role of behavioural factors such as subjective time preferences. This study examines the relationship between subjective time preferences and time poverty in Ghana, with a particular focus on the mediating roles of committed time in informal work and consumption‐based welfare. Using data from the seventh round of the Ghana Living Standards Survey (GLSS 7) and an instrumental variable mediation framework to address potential endogeneity, we find that households headed by more impatient individuals are 3% less likely to be associated with time poverty. Decomposing this association reveals that adjustments in committed time in informal work are the dominant mediating channel, accounting for a substantial share of the total effect. The finding suggests that impatience can reduce time poverty by limiting prolonged engagement in time‐intensive informal activities. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the negative association between impatient household heads and time poverty is stronger among males, adults, urban residents and noninsured households. The results highlight the importance of incorporating behavioural preferences into analyses of time poverty and point to policies that improve work quality, welfare and labour market stability as key levers for reducing excessive time burdens.

Journal of International Development
World Bank (US), Loyola University Chicago (US), Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (GH)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.