Freedom corrupted? democratic legitimation in South Africa at democracy@30

Democratic legitimacy is a multifaceted concept, contested in its definition and conceptualization (Severs & Mattelaer 2014; Zelditch 2001). Often seen as born in the work of Max Weber (Beetham 1991; Smith 1970; Wiesner & Harfst 2022), legitimacy is the foundation on which authority to hold power is constructed. Political legitimacy establishes both a moral and legal right to rule or govern, ensuring public acceptance and support for a particular regime, whether democratic or authoritarian (Lyotard & Lindsay 1987). There is a deep appreciation that without legitimacy, governments, whether democratic or autocratic, risk losing their authority, leading to instability, resistance or rebellion. Political legitimacy, however, remains a highly contested notion conceptually. It is also challenging to empirically measure democratic legitimacy. Democratic legitimacy involves subjective perceptions of fairness, representation and trust, which vary across individuals and societies (Spencer 1970; Tyler 2006). Additionally, political systems often have complex and evolving structures, making it difficult to define clear benchmarks for legitimacy (Severs & Mattelaer 2014; Wiesner & Harfst 2022). Legitimacy inherently deals with the relationship between citizens and governments, or citizens and their rulers (Severs & Mattelaer 2014).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/32359962
Primary Topic
Reformed Theology and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freedom corrupted? democratic legitimation in South Africa at democracy@30

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Reformed Theology and Governance
article

Freedom corrupted? democratic legitimation in South Africa at democracy@30

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

Democratic legitimacy is a multifaceted concept, contested in its definition and conceptualization (Severs & Mattelaer 2014; Zelditch 2001). Often seen as born in the work of Max Weber (Beetham 1991; Smith 1970; Wiesner & Harfst 2022), legitimacy is the foundation on which authority to hold power is constructed. Political legitimacy establishes both a moral and legal right to rule or govern, ensuring public acceptance and support for a particular regime, whether democratic or authoritarian (Lyotard & Lindsay 1987). There is a deep appreciation that without legitimacy, governments, whether democratic or autocratic, risk losing their authority, leading to instability, resistance or rebellion. Political legitimacy, however, remains a highly contested notion conceptually. It is also challenging to empirically measure democratic legitimacy. Democratic legitimacy involves subjective perceptions of fairness, representation and trust, which vary across individuals and societies (Spencer 1970; Tyler 2006). Additionally, political systems often have complex and evolving structures, making it difficult to define clear benchmarks for legitimacy (Severs & Mattelaer 2014; Wiesner & Harfst 2022). Legitimacy inherently deals with the relationship between citizens and governments, or citizens and their rulers (Severs & Mattelaer 2014).

Human Science Research Council SA
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Reformed Theology and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.