Core Content Related to Teaching Biomechanical Aspects of Human Movement for Physical Therapist Students: A Modified Delphi Study

INTRODUCTION: In efforts to optimize movement, physical therapists must have a fundamental understanding of kinesiological and biomechanical principles. REVIEW OF LITERATURE: There has not been an attempt to define educational content in biomechanics and related topics for physical therapists since 1984. The aim of this modified Delphi study was to identify core content topics related to the biomechanical aspects of human movement for physical therapists. SUBJECTS: Fourteen subject matter experts were asked to rate the importance of each biomechanical topic. METHODS: A modified Delphi approach used 3 rounds of surveys to rank the importance of 166 biomechanical topics across 11 categories. The 11 categories, gleaned from textbooks and foundational research, were units of measure; body segment variables; arthrology; kinematics; forces/kinetics; material properties; muscle mechanics; movement screen; gait; computational methods; and instrumentation. Round 1 also allowed the experts to suggest additional topics for consideration in round 2. Rounds 2 and 3 aimed for consensus for all topics. A 75% threshold as "important" or "very important" was used to determine consensus for each topic. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen of 166 topics (68%) were identified as important or very important to teach physical therapist students. The percentage of topics that met consensus per category was as follows: units of measures (20%); body segment variables (50%); arthrology (71%); kinematics (80%); forces/kinetics (91%); material properties (79%); muscle mechanics (100%); movement screen (80%); gait (100%); computational methods (17%); and instrumentation (17%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study identified key topics that should serve as a guideline for curricular content related to biomechanics. Results suggest that content should focus on kinematics, forces/kinetics, material properties, muscle mechanics, movement screening, and gait. Additional topics related to units of measure, computational methods, and instrumentation could also be considered. Adoption of this core content could promote consistency in biomechanics content across physical therapist education programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physical Therapy Education
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jte.0000000000000483
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Core Content Related to Teaching Biomechanical Aspects of Human Movement for Physical Therapist Students: A Modified Delphi Study

Robin M. Queen, Craig A. Wassinger, Carla Sabus, Carol A. Oatis et al.
Journal of Physical Therapy Education
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
article

Core Content Related to Teaching Biomechanical Aspects of Human Movement for Physical Therapist Students: A Modified Delphi Study

Robin M. Queen, Craig A. Wassinger, Carla Sabus, Carol A. Oatis, Bryan C. Heiderscheit, Timothy E. Hewett, Irene S. Davis, Jeremiah J. Tate, Pamela K. Levangie, Richard W. Willy, Christopher M. Powers, Phillip W. Mcclure, Kevin R. Ford, John D. Willson, Ellen Shanley, Duane V. Knudson, Stephen J. Thomas
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In efforts to optimize movement, physical therapists must have a fundamental understanding of kinesiological and biomechanical principles. REVIEW OF LITERATURE: There has not been an attempt to define educational content in biomechanics and related topics for physical therapists since 1984. The aim of this modified Delphi study was to identify core content topics related to the biomechanical aspects of human movement for physical therapists. SUBJECTS: Fourteen subject matter experts were asked to rate the importance of each biomechanical topic. METHODS: A modified Delphi approach used 3 rounds of surveys to rank the importance of 166 biomechanical topics across 11 categories. The 11 categories, gleaned from textbooks and foundational research, were units of measure; body segment variables; arthrology; kinematics; forces/kinetics; material properties; muscle mechanics; movement screen; gait; computational methods; and instrumentation. Round 1 also allowed the experts to suggest additional topics for consideration in round 2. Rounds 2 and 3 aimed for consensus for all topics. A 75% threshold as "important" or "very important" was used to determine consensus for each topic. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen of 166 topics (68%) were identified as important or very important to teach physical therapist students. The percentage of topics that met consensus per category was as follows: units of measures (20%); body segment variables (50%); arthrology (71%); kinematics (80%); forces/kinetics (91%); material properties (79%); muscle mechanics (100%); movement screen (80%); gait (100%); computational methods (17%); and instrumentation (17%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study identified key topics that should serve as a guideline for curricular content related to biomechanics. Results suggest that content should focus on kinematics, forces/kinetics, material properties, muscle mechanics, movement screening, and gait. Additional topics related to units of measure, computational methods, and instrumentation could also be considered. Adoption of this core content could promote consistency in biomechanics content across physical therapist education programs.

Journal of Physical Therapy Education
High Point University (US), University of Southern California (US), Tufts University (US), Pearson (United States) (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), MGH Institute of Health Professions (US), New York Times (US), Arcadia (US), Richard Wolf (Germany) (DE), Pi (United Kingdom) (GB), TOCA at Banner Health (US), Pro Persona (NL), University of California, Davis (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.