Between-session reliability and sensitivity of force production characteristics across various force-time points during the isometric single-leg long-lever bridge

The purpose of this study was to assess the between-session reliability of peak force and early force-time variables in a unilateral isometric hamstring assessment (isometric long-lever bridge). The sample consisted of 30 collegiate male athletes (age: 19.4 ± 1.3 years; height: 1.79 ± 0.1 m; body mass: 80.4 ± 10.3 kg) with no history of recent hamstring injury (<6 months) who volunteered to participate in the study. All participants performed 3 unilateral maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) with their heels on force plates and shoulders elevated 15.24 cm, while their hips were secured with a loaded barbell. Data was analyzed to assess the reliability of force values at 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 ms, and peak force (N) across three repeated sessions. Moderate-good relative and absolute reliabilities were observed across all early force-time variables with lower bound ICC values ≥ 0.51 (0.51-0.71) and point estimate CV% ≤ 12.65% (7.63-12.65), with moderate relative (ICC ≥ 0.74; range 0.74-0.92) and absolute (CV% ≤ 6.50%; range 6.48-6.50) reliability for peak force. Trivial to small effect sizes (g ≤ 0.4) were observed between sessions. These findings suggest that the isometric single-leg long-lever bridge (SL-LLB) can be used to reliably monitor peak and rapid force generating capacities to track performance changes over time due to training adaptations as well as acute or chronic fatigue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350197
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between-session reliability and sensitivity of force production characteristics across various force-time points during the isometric single-leg long-lever bridge

Paul Comfort, Conor J. Cantwell, Adam E. Sundh, A. J. Lamb et al.
PLoS ONE
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Between-session reliability and sensitivity of force production characteristics across various force-time points during the isometric single-leg long-lever bridge

Paul Comfort, Conor J. Cantwell, Adam E. Sundh, A. J. Lamb, Nicholas J. Ripley
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the between-session reliability of peak force and early force-time variables in a unilateral isometric hamstring assessment (isometric long-lever bridge). The sample consisted of 30 collegiate male athletes (age: 19.4 ± 1.3 years; height: 1.79 ± 0.1 m; body mass: 80.4 ± 10.3 kg) with no history of recent hamstring injury (<6 months) who volunteered to participate in the study. All participants performed 3 unilateral maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) with their heels on force plates and shoulders elevated 15.24 cm, while their hips were secured with a loaded barbell. Data was analyzed to assess the reliability of force values at 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 ms, and peak force (N) across three repeated sessions. Moderate-good relative and absolute reliabilities were observed across all early force-time variables with lower bound ICC values ≥ 0.51 (0.51-0.71) and point estimate CV% ≤ 12.65% (7.63-12.65), with moderate relative (ICC ≥ 0.74; range 0.74-0.92) and absolute (CV% ≤ 6.50%; range 6.48-6.50) reliability for peak force. Trivial to small effect sizes (g ≤ 0.4) were observed between sessions. These findings suggest that the isometric single-leg long-lever bridge (SL-LLB) can be used to reliably monitor peak and rapid force generating capacities to track performance changes over time due to training adaptations as well as acute or chronic fatigue.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(5)
Edith Cowan University (AU), William & Mary (US), Manchester City Football Club (GB), University of Salford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.