Between-session reliability and sensitivity of force production characteristics across various force-time points during the isometric single-leg long-lever bridge
The purpose of this study was to assess the between-session reliability of peak force and early force-time variables in a unilateral isometric hamstring assessment (isometric long-lever bridge). The sample consisted of 30 collegiate male athletes (age: 19.4 ± 1.3 years; height: 1.79 ± 0.1 m; body mass: 80.4 ± 10.3 kg) with no history of recent hamstring injury (<6 months) who volunteered to participate in the study. All participants performed 3 unilateral maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) with their heels on force plates and shoulders elevated 15.24 cm, while their hips were secured with a loaded barbell. Data was analyzed to assess the reliability of force values at 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 ms, and peak force (N) across three repeated sessions. Moderate-good relative and absolute reliabilities were observed across all early force-time variables with lower bound ICC values ≥ 0.51 (0.51-0.71) and point estimate CV% ≤ 12.65% (7.63-12.65), with moderate relative (ICC ≥ 0.74; range 0.74-0.92) and absolute (CV% ≤ 6.50%; range 6.48-6.50) reliability for peak force. Trivial to small effect sizes (g ≤ 0.4) were observed between sessions. These findings suggest that the isometric single-leg long-lever bridge (SL-LLB) can be used to reliably monitor peak and rapid force generating capacities to track performance changes over time due to training adaptations as well as acute or chronic fatigue.
Authors
- Paul Comfort (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1131-8626)
- Conor J. Cantwell
- Adam E. Sundh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5232-5555)
- A. J. Lamb
- Nicholas J. Ripley
Institutions
- Edith Cowan University (AU)
- William & Mary (US)
- Manchester City Football Club (GB)
- University of Salford (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2026-05-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350197
- Primary Topic
- Sports injuries and prevention
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00