Digital measurement of blepharoptosis using smartphone photography and built-in markup tools: A prospective, blinded methodological comparison study with traditional ruler-based assessment

To evaluate the accuracy, consistency, and efficiency of a novel digital measurement method for blepharoptosis grading utilizing iPhone photography and built-in markup tools, compared to the traditional ruler method. In this prospective, blinded methodological comparison study, 145 patients (185 eyes) with blepharoptosis were enrolled. Each patient underwent marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1) measurement via both the traditional ruler method (control) and the iPhone method (experimental). The iPhone method involved capturing standardized photographs and performing measurements using the device's native markup feature. Agreement between methods was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Grading consistency was evaluated using the Kappa statistic, and operational efficiency was compared via independent t-tests. The mean MRD1 values were 2.18 ± 0.94 mm (ruler) and 2.22 ± 0.89 mm (iPhone), with no statistically significant difference (P = .188). The 2 methods demonstrated excellent agreement, with an ICC of 0.968 (95% CI: 0.956-0.977). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -0.04 mm, with 95% limits of agreement from -0.51 mm to 0.43 mm. Clinical grading consistency was almost perfect (Kappa = 0.892). The iPhone method was significantly more efficient, requiring less time than the traditional method (64.8 ± 18.7 s vs 86.5 ± 22.3 s, P < .001). The smartphone-based digital measurement method proves to be an accurate, reliable, and efficient alternative to the traditional ruler method for quantifying MRD1 and grading blepharoptosis. It demonstrates high agreement with conventional techniques while offering advantages in standardization, traceability, and operational workflow. This approach holds significant potential for enhancing diagnostic precision in clinical practice, particularly in outpatient and primary care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048978
Primary Topic
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital measurement of blepharoptosis using smartphone photography and built-in markup tools: A prospective, blinded methodological comparison study with traditional ruler-based assessment

Ziqing He, Yue Wang, Kaixi Tan, Lan Wang et al.
Medicine
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
article

Digital measurement of blepharoptosis using smartphone photography and built-in markup tools: A prospective, blinded methodological comparison study with traditional ruler-based assessment

Ziqing He, Yue Wang, Kaixi Tan, Lan Wang, J Zhang, Feng Yang, Bin Jiang, Peihan Tang
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy, consistency, and efficiency of a novel digital measurement method for blepharoptosis grading utilizing iPhone photography and built-in markup tools, compared to the traditional ruler method. In this prospective, blinded methodological comparison study, 145 patients (185 eyes) with blepharoptosis were enrolled. Each patient underwent marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1) measurement via both the traditional ruler method (control) and the iPhone method (experimental). The iPhone method involved capturing standardized photographs and performing measurements using the device's native markup feature. Agreement between methods was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Grading consistency was evaluated using the Kappa statistic, and operational efficiency was compared via independent t-tests. The mean MRD1 values were 2.18 ± 0.94 mm (ruler) and 2.22 ± 0.89 mm (iPhone), with no statistically significant difference (P = .188). The 2 methods demonstrated excellent agreement, with an ICC of 0.968 (95% CI: 0.956-0.977). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of -0.04 mm, with 95% limits of agreement from -0.51 mm to 0.43 mm. Clinical grading consistency was almost perfect (Kappa = 0.892). The iPhone method was significantly more efficient, requiring less time than the traditional method (64.8 ± 18.7 s vs 86.5 ± 22.3 s, P < .001). The smartphone-based digital measurement method proves to be an accurate, reliable, and efficient alternative to the traditional ruler method for quantifying MRD1 and grading blepharoptosis. It demonstrates high agreement with conventional techniques while offering advantages in standardization, traceability, and operational workflow. This approach holds significant potential for enhancing diagnostic precision in clinical practice, particularly in outpatient and primary care settings.

MedicineVol. 105(21)
University of South China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.