How AI Will Monetize Education: Response to Dekker and Hermans

Abstract This is a response to "Why the User-Friendliness of AI Undermines Education. Commentary on Wieczorek 2025" by Dekker and Hermans. While I agree with many of the arguments made by the authors and sympathise with the educational vision they want to promote, I point out that the political-economic dimension of generative AI may make it incompatible with the idea of good education and particularly with the idea of "constrained AI" proposed in the commentary. I argue that each passing day brings more evidence that the political economy of generative AI should offer us sufficient grounds for rejecting the technology (in education and beyond).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-01115-3
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How AI Will Monetize Education: Response to Dekker and Hermans

Michał Wieczorek
Philosophy & Technology
Digital Education and Society
article

How AI Will Monetize Education: Response to Dekker and Hermans

Michał Wieczorek
article en

Abstract

Abstract This is a response to "Why the User-Friendliness of AI Undermines Education. Commentary on Wieczorek 2025" by Dekker and Hermans. While I agree with many of the arguments made by the authors and sympathise with the educational vision they want to promote, I point out that the political-economic dimension of generative AI may make it incompatible with the idea of good education and particularly with the idea of "constrained AI" proposed in the commentary. I argue that each passing day brings more evidence that the political economy of generative AI should offer us sufficient grounds for rejecting the technology (in education and beyond).

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 39(2)
University College Dublin (IE)
University College Dublin
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.