Estimating the societal impact of medical interventions: a case study in metastatic breast cancer

Aim: Additional value elements like productivity are currently rarely included in economic evaluations since quantitative assessment may be complex or lack clear guidance. In this study we present a practical framework for estimating the societal impact of medical interventions by incorporating additional value elements into economic evaluations. Materials & methods: We applied this framework in the case of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for patients with metastatic breast cancer in five European countries (EU5). In this study we considered the following elements: productivity losses in paid and unpaid work, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) valued at willingness-to-pay thresholds, the impact on childcare responsibilities, costs associated with formal caregivers, the effect on informal caregivers and impact on governmental accounts including tax revenue, pension and disability benefits. Results: Our findings indicated that some of the value elements included may lead to a positive societal value for the intervention, while others may result in additional costs. Positive impacts were seen in gains to patient productivity (€589 million), QALYs (€1.7 billion), unpaid work (€259 million), childcare responsibilities (€5 million) and tax revenue (€165 million). Conversely, our findings highlighted a greater demand for formal and informal care (-€29 million and -€7 million, respectively) and increased public spending on disability benefits (-€380 million) and pensions (-€44 million) attributed to T-DXd. The main causes of increased costs were the improvement in progression-free and overall survival achieved with T-DXd. Conclusion: Overall, this framework aims to quantify the societal value of new healthcare interventions. This metastatic breast cancer case study illustrates how key value elements can be integrated into economic evaluations, beyond the classical cost–effectiveness analysis, to further support reimbursement decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2026-0005
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the societal impact of medical interventions: a case study in metastatic breast cancer

Mats Rosenlund, Foteini Tsotra, Lena Steinbeck, Kyle Dunton et al.
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Estimating the societal impact of medical interventions: a case study in metastatic breast cancer

Mats Rosenlund, Foteini Tsotra, Lena Steinbeck, Kyle Dunton, Sukhvinder Johal
article en

Abstract

Aim: Additional value elements like productivity are currently rarely included in economic evaluations since quantitative assessment may be complex or lack clear guidance. In this study we present a practical framework for estimating the societal impact of medical interventions by incorporating additional value elements into economic evaluations. Materials & methods: We applied this framework in the case of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for patients with metastatic breast cancer in five European countries (EU5). In this study we considered the following elements: productivity losses in paid and unpaid work, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) valued at willingness-to-pay thresholds, the impact on childcare responsibilities, costs associated with formal caregivers, the effect on informal caregivers and impact on governmental accounts including tax revenue, pension and disability benefits. Results: Our findings indicated that some of the value elements included may lead to a positive societal value for the intervention, while others may result in additional costs. Positive impacts were seen in gains to patient productivity (€589 million), QALYs (€1.7 billion), unpaid work (€259 million), childcare responsibilities (€5 million) and tax revenue (€165 million). Conversely, our findings highlighted a greater demand for formal and informal care (-€29 million and -€7 million, respectively) and increased public spending on disability benefits (-€380 million) and pensions (-€44 million) attributed to T-DXd. The main causes of increased costs were the improvement in progression-free and overall survival achieved with T-DXd. Conclusion: Overall, this framework aims to quantify the societal value of new healthcare interventions. This metastatic breast cancer case study illustrates how key value elements can be integrated into economic evaluations, beyond the classical cost–effectiveness analysis, to further support reimbursement decisions.

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), Daiichi Sankyo (Germany) (DE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Daiichi Sankyo (United Kingdom) (GB), Institut Wohnen und Umwelt (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.