Wettability of 3D-Printed Denture Base Resins Compared with Conventional Heat-Polymerized and Milled Counterparts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

Background/Objectives: Wettability is a key surface property of denture base resins and is related to denture retention through interfacial cohesive–adhesive forces; conversely, compromised material wettability facilitates bacterial adhesion and colonization. Although three-dimensional (3D) printing has become an increasingly popular method for fabricating dentures, there is insufficient evidence regarding the wettability of 3D-printed denture base resins. This study aims to evaluate the wettability of 3D-printed, heat-polymerized, and milled denture base resins by comparing their contact angles. Methods: A search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science, while grey literature was also assessed. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies (QUIN). Meta-analyses were conducted using inverse variance and the random effects model. Results: A total of nine and seven studies were included in the quantitative synthesis comparing 3D-printed denture base resins with heat-polymerized and milled resins, respectively. A statistically significant difference of −6.50 degrees was observed in favor of 3D-printed denture base resins compared to heat-polymerized ones (95% CI: −12.11 to −0.90, I2 = 99%), while the comparison between 3D-printed and milled resins showed a non-statistically significant mean difference (MD: 0.87, 95% CI: −5.08 to 6.82, I2 = 98%). Conclusions: The available in vitro evidence indicates that 3D-printed denture base resins tend to exhibit improved surface wettability compared with heat-polymerized resins and perform similarly to milled resins. However, given the extremely high heterogeneity, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as clinical performance depends on the complex interplay between surface characteristics and microbial adhesion rather than solely on wettability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prosthesis
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis8060050
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wettability of 3D-Printed Denture Base Resins Compared with Conventional Heat-Polymerized and Milled Counterparts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

Eleni Kotsiomiti, Ioannis Tsolianos, Όλγα Νάκα, Savvas Kamalakidis
Prosthesis
Dental materials and restorations
article

Wettability of 3D-Printed Denture Base Resins Compared with Conventional Heat-Polymerized and Milled Counterparts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

Eleni Kotsiomiti, Ioannis Tsolianos, Όλγα Νάκα, Savvas Kamalakidis
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Wettability is a key surface property of denture base resins and is related to denture retention through interfacial cohesive–adhesive forces; conversely, compromised material wettability facilitates bacterial adhesion and colonization. Although three-dimensional (3D) printing has become an increasingly popular method for fabricating dentures, there is insufficient evidence regarding the wettability of 3D-printed denture base resins. This study aims to evaluate the wettability of 3D-printed, heat-polymerized, and milled denture base resins by comparing their contact angles. Methods: A search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science, while grey literature was also assessed. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies (QUIN). Meta-analyses were conducted using inverse variance and the random effects model. Results: A total of nine and seven studies were included in the quantitative synthesis comparing 3D-printed denture base resins with heat-polymerized and milled resins, respectively. A statistically significant difference of −6.50 degrees was observed in favor of 3D-printed denture base resins compared to heat-polymerized ones (95% CI: −12.11 to −0.90, I2 = 99%), while the comparison between 3D-printed and milled resins showed a non-statistically significant mean difference (MD: 0.87, 95% CI: −5.08 to 6.82, I2 = 98%). Conclusions: The available in vitro evidence indicates that 3D-printed denture base resins tend to exhibit improved surface wettability compared with heat-polymerized resins and perform similarly to milled resins. However, given the extremely high heterogeneity, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as clinical performance depends on the complex interplay between surface characteristics and microbial adhesion rather than solely on wettability.

ProsthesisVol. 8(6)
Tufts University (US), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.