Systemic Glucocorticoid Immunosuppression and Survival Among Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Recipients

Importance: Systemic glucocorticoid immunosuppression (gsISP) is commonly used among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, but the associations of gsISP timing, dose, and duration with overall survival (OS) remain incompletely characterized. Objective: To examine the associations of gsISP timing, dose, and duration with OS among ICI recipients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included ICI recipients treated at Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (MGBD) from May 31, 2015, through October 11, 2021, and matched ICI recipients from the TriNetX database from April 30, 2010, through October 11, 2021, for independent validation. The TriNetX cohort was matched 2:1 to the MGBD cohort using propensity scores based on patient baseline characteristics and year of ICI initiation. Exposure: gsISP, evaluated according to timing relative to ICI initiation, prednisone-equivalent dose, and duration of exposure. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was OS. Multivariable accelerated failure time models were used to estimate time ratios (TRs) and 95% CIs, with TR values less than 1 indicating shorter survival. Results: This study included 39 258 patients, with 13 086 in the MGBD cohort and 26 172 in the TriNetX cohort. In the MGBD and TriNetX cohorts, 53.6% and 55.4% of patients were men, and 63.6% and 64.2% were younger than 70 years (mean [SD] age, 64.7 [13.0] years and 64.9 [12.6] years), respectively. In the MGBD cohort, patients who received gsISP within 1 year of ICI initiation had worse OS compared with patients not treated with gsISP, with the most pronounced association observed among patients receiving gsISP within 1 month of ICI initiation (TR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.45-0.54]). Higher doses and longer durations were also associated with shorter OS; dosages greater than 60 mg/d were associated with 37% (95% CI, 25%-52%) shorter OS, and durations longer than 7 days were associated with 33% (95% CI, 12%-49%) shorter OS. These findings were independently validated in the TriNetX cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of ICI recipients, 3 factors were associated with worse OS: gsISP near ICI initiation, higher gsISP dose, and longer gsISP duration, regardless of indication. These findings may provide clinically relevant information to guide gsISP management among ICI recipients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.14323
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic Glucocorticoid Immunosuppression and Survival Among Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Recipients

Munachimso Amadife, Kun‐Hsing Yu, Kimberly Tang, Guihong Wan et al.
JAMA Network Open
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Systemic Glucocorticoid Immunosuppression and Survival Among Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Recipients

Munachimso Amadife, Kun‐Hsing Yu, Kimberly Tang, Guihong Wan, Bonnie W. Leung, Nga Nguyen, Boshen Yan, KERRY L. REYNOLDS, Genevieve Boland, Sara Khattab, Shawn G. Kwatra, Charles Lu, Yevgeniy R. Semenov, Christopher Thang, Wenxin Chen, Alexander Gusev, Nicole R. LeBoeuf, Ahmad Rajeh
article en

Abstract

Importance: Systemic glucocorticoid immunosuppression (gsISP) is commonly used among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, but the associations of gsISP timing, dose, and duration with overall survival (OS) remain incompletely characterized. Objective: To examine the associations of gsISP timing, dose, and duration with OS among ICI recipients. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included ICI recipients treated at Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (MGBD) from May 31, 2015, through October 11, 2021, and matched ICI recipients from the TriNetX database from April 30, 2010, through October 11, 2021, for independent validation. The TriNetX cohort was matched 2:1 to the MGBD cohort using propensity scores based on patient baseline characteristics and year of ICI initiation. Exposure: gsISP, evaluated according to timing relative to ICI initiation, prednisone-equivalent dose, and duration of exposure. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was OS. Multivariable accelerated failure time models were used to estimate time ratios (TRs) and 95% CIs, with TR values less than 1 indicating shorter survival. Results: This study included 39 258 patients, with 13 086 in the MGBD cohort and 26 172 in the TriNetX cohort. In the MGBD and TriNetX cohorts, 53.6% and 55.4% of patients were men, and 63.6% and 64.2% were younger than 70 years (mean [SD] age, 64.7 [13.0] years and 64.9 [12.6] years), respectively. In the MGBD cohort, patients who received gsISP within 1 year of ICI initiation had worse OS compared with patients not treated with gsISP, with the most pronounced association observed among patients receiving gsISP within 1 month of ICI initiation (TR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.45-0.54]). Higher doses and longer durations were also associated with shorter OS; dosages greater than 60 mg/d were associated with 37% (95% CI, 25%-52%) shorter OS, and durations longer than 7 days were associated with 33% (95% CI, 12%-49%) shorter OS. These findings were independently validated in the TriNetX cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of ICI recipients, 3 factors were associated with worse OS: gsISP near ICI initiation, higher gsISP dose, and longer gsISP duration, regardless of indication. These findings may provide clinically relevant information to guide gsISP management among ICI recipients.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(5)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.