Risk Spillovers: When Politics Meets Sustainability

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between firms’ political risk and their susceptibility to the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. Using quarterly data of U.S. public firms from 2019 to 2022, we find that firms exposed to higher uncertainty in political matters have higher exposure to financial risk caused by material ESG issues. While previous studies report that, as political volatility rises, firms invest more in sustainability‐related activities to maintain legitimacy, we show empirical evidence that corporate ESG risk scores still increase in the face of heightened political risk, suggesting that their ESG initiatives in reaction to political instability are ineffective in mitigating firms’ exposure to ESG challenges. Political uncertainty creates negative sentiment toward political matters, which can signal an unfavorable environment for long‐term sustainability developments, or higher ESG risks for firms. Our results also show that some strategic attributes, such as international presence and CEOs’ generalist skills, can protect firms’ ESG risk profiles from political turbulence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.70044
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Spillovers: When Politics Meets Sustainability

Feng Dong, Son Wilson
Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Risk Spillovers: When Politics Meets Sustainability

Feng Dong, Son Wilson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship between firms’ political risk and their susceptibility to the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues. Using quarterly data of U.S. public firms from 2019 to 2022, we find that firms exposed to higher uncertainty in political matters have higher exposure to financial risk caused by material ESG issues. While previous studies report that, as political volatility rises, firms invest more in sustainability‐related activities to maintain legitimacy, we show empirical evidence that corporate ESG risk scores still increase in the face of heightened political risk, suggesting that their ESG initiatives in reaction to political instability are ineffective in mitigating firms’ exposure to ESG challenges. Political uncertainty creates negative sentiment toward political matters, which can signal an unfavorable environment for long‐term sustainability developments, or higher ESG risks for firms. Our results also show that some strategic attributes, such as international presence and CEOs’ generalist skills, can protect firms’ ESG risk profiles from political turbulence.

Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance
East Tennessee State University (US), Elon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.