Removing Barriers to Value Cocreation in Conflict-Ridden Projects: An Exploration of Inclusive Third-Party-Assisted Dialogue Practices

Incompatible stakeholder perspectives often hinder value cocreation in conflict-ridden projects, despite societal expectations for greater inclusion of market and nonmarket voices. Based on expert interviews, we explore how third-party facilitators address deteriorated stakeholder relationships in seemingly intractable conflicts. We develop a typology of four dialogue practices—decoupling, bypassing, buffering, and healing—that respond to stakeholders’ readiness to engage, shaped by vulnerability tolerance associated with suspicion or distrust and values- or malevolence-based concerns. Our findings indicate that these practices create inclusive conditions that enable stakeholders to cocreate the relational foundation for constructive interaction, thereby advancing understanding of inclusive project stakeholder engagement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Project Management Journal
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728261450947
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Removing Barriers to Value Cocreation in Conflict-Ridden Projects: An Exploration of Inclusive Third-Party-Assisted Dialogue Practices

Tiziana Gaito
Project Management Journal
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Removing Barriers to Value Cocreation in Conflict-Ridden Projects: An Exploration of Inclusive Third-Party-Assisted Dialogue Practices

Tiziana Gaito
article en

Abstract

Incompatible stakeholder perspectives often hinder value cocreation in conflict-ridden projects, despite societal expectations for greater inclusion of market and nonmarket voices. Based on expert interviews, we explore how third-party facilitators address deteriorated stakeholder relationships in seemingly intractable conflicts. We develop a typology of four dialogue practices—decoupling, bypassing, buffering, and healing—that respond to stakeholders’ readiness to engage, shaped by vulnerability tolerance associated with suspicion or distrust and values- or malevolence-based concerns. Our findings indicate that these practices create inclusive conditions that enable stakeholders to cocreate the relational foundation for constructive interaction, thereby advancing understanding of inclusive project stakeholder engagement.

Project Management Journal
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.