Development of a Clinical Prediction Model for Recurrent Anaphylaxis

Background/Objectives: Preventing recurrent anaphylaxis is crucial for patient safety. This study aimed to identify predictive factors and develop a prediction model to estimate recurrence risk, thereby enhancing targeted preventive strategies. Methods: This prognostic prediction study used a retrospective observational cohort design, analyzing medical records from an anaphylaxis registry at Naresuan University Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand, between March 2011 and February 2021. We developed a prediction model using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Statistically significant and clinically relevant predictors were weighted into a risk score derived from hazard ratio regression coefficients. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC), calibration metrics, and decision curve analysis. Results: Over the 10-year period, 381 patients experienced 439 anaphylaxis episodes, including 58 recurrences (13.2%). The final model comprised six predictors: history of food, insect, and drug allergies; asthma; chest discomfort; and severe anaphylaxis. Corresponding risk scores were 4, 5, 5.5, 1, 2.5, and 1.5 points, respectively. Total scores ranged from 0 to 19.5 and were categorized into low (<3.0), moderate (3.0–9.0), and high (>9.0) risk groups. The high-risk group had a likelihood ratio positive (LHR+) of 4.65. The model demonstrated acceptable discrimination (AuROC 0.773 (95% CI: 0.714–0.832)) and good calibration. Bootstrap validation showed consistent performance (AuROC 0.773 (95% CI: 0.714–0.831)). Decision curve analysis indicated clinical utility across relevant threshold probabilities. Conclusions: This prediction model provides a simple, clinically applicable tool for estimating the risk of recurrent anaphylaxis and may support improved prevention and management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15113990
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Clinical Prediction Model for Recurrent Anaphylaxis

Suwannee Uthaisangsook, Sagoontee Inkate, Susita Wangchiraniran
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Development of a Clinical Prediction Model for Recurrent Anaphylaxis

Suwannee Uthaisangsook, Sagoontee Inkate, Susita Wangchiraniran
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Preventing recurrent anaphylaxis is crucial for patient safety. This study aimed to identify predictive factors and develop a prediction model to estimate recurrence risk, thereby enhancing targeted preventive strategies. Methods: This prognostic prediction study used a retrospective observational cohort design, analyzing medical records from an anaphylaxis registry at Naresuan University Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand, between March 2011 and February 2021. We developed a prediction model using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Statistically significant and clinically relevant predictors were weighted into a risk score derived from hazard ratio regression coefficients. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC), calibration metrics, and decision curve analysis. Results: Over the 10-year period, 381 patients experienced 439 anaphylaxis episodes, including 58 recurrences (13.2%). The final model comprised six predictors: history of food, insect, and drug allergies; asthma; chest discomfort; and severe anaphylaxis. Corresponding risk scores were 4, 5, 5.5, 1, 2.5, and 1.5 points, respectively. Total scores ranged from 0 to 19.5 and were categorized into low (<3.0), moderate (3.0–9.0), and high (>9.0) risk groups. The high-risk group had a likelihood ratio positive (LHR+) of 4.65. The model demonstrated acceptable discrimination (AuROC 0.773 (95% CI: 0.714–0.832)) and good calibration. Bootstrap validation showed consistent performance (AuROC 0.773 (95% CI: 0.714–0.831)). Decision curve analysis indicated clinical utility across relevant threshold probabilities. Conclusions: This prediction model provides a simple, clinically applicable tool for estimating the risk of recurrent anaphylaxis and may support improved prevention and management strategies.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(11)
Naresuan University (TH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.