Integration of a collaborative robotic platform in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safety, feasibility, and operative time variability

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a high-volume procedure with relatively short operative times, leaving limited margin for further reduction in mean duration. However, variability in operative performance, compounded by anatomical variation and differing degrees of inflammation, may substantially affect operative duration and operating room efficiency. The Maestro™ Platform is a bedside, AI-powered, co-manipulated surgical assistance system designed to improve visualization, stability, and ergonomics during MIS while preserving surgeon autonomy, standard laparoscopic instrumentation, and conventional operative technique. This study aims to assess the operative and perioperative outcomes of Maestro-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with a focus on variability in operative time. This study prospectively included 79 Maestro-assisted cholecystectomies procedures. Those cases were retrospectively compared with 79 consecutive baseline laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by the same surgical team. Demographic data, operative time, length of stay and 30-day complications were analyzed. Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts were generated to evaluate the process stability and variability for operative times. The Maestro demonstrated a 35% reduction in operative time variability (p < 0.001). The SPC charts show significantly reduced variability and greater process stability with the Maestro Platform than conventional laparoscopy. Postoperative outcomes were comparable. No device-related complications or conversions occurred. Maestro-assisted cholecystectomy demonstrated operative time and perioperative outcomes comparable to conventional laparoscopy, while showing a significant reduction in operative time variability. For short procedures, this improved predictability may offer substantial workflow and scheduling advantages, such as more on-time starts and reduced overtime hours.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-03478-3
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of a collaborative robotic platform in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safety, feasibility, and operative time variability

Reitano Elisa, Azagury Dan, Mercoli Henry, Leclerc Fabrice
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Integration of a collaborative robotic platform in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safety, feasibility, and operative time variability

Reitano Elisa, Azagury Dan, Mercoli Henry, Leclerc Fabrice
article en

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a high-volume procedure with relatively short operative times, leaving limited margin for further reduction in mean duration. However, variability in operative performance, compounded by anatomical variation and differing degrees of inflammation, may substantially affect operative duration and operating room efficiency. The Maestro™ Platform is a bedside, AI-powered, co-manipulated surgical assistance system designed to improve visualization, stability, and ergonomics during MIS while preserving surgeon autonomy, standard laparoscopic instrumentation, and conventional operative technique. This study aims to assess the operative and perioperative outcomes of Maestro-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with a focus on variability in operative time. This study prospectively included 79 Maestro-assisted cholecystectomies procedures. Those cases were retrospectively compared with 79 consecutive baseline laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by the same surgical team. Demographic data, operative time, length of stay and 30-day complications were analyzed. Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts were generated to evaluate the process stability and variability for operative times. The Maestro demonstrated a 35% reduction in operative time variability (p < 0.001). The SPC charts show significantly reduced variability and greater process stability with the Maestro Platform than conventional laparoscopy. Postoperative outcomes were comparable. No device-related complications or conversions occurred. Maestro-assisted cholecystectomy demonstrated operative time and perioperative outcomes comparable to conventional laparoscopy, while showing a significant reduction in operative time variability. For short procedures, this improved predictability may offer substantial workflow and scheduling advantages, such as more on-time starts and reduced overtime hours.

Journal of Robotic SurgeryVol. 20(1)
Stanford Medicine (US), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR), Polyclinique de Franche Comté (FR), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.