Youth, skills, and informal sectors in the Global South: theoretical and methodological lenses on learning and livelihoods

Education and training have largely failed to respond to the needs of those who generate livelihoods outside of the formal economy. Neglect of the informal sector is partly due to it eluding ‘legibility’: states generally only ‘see’ what can be measured and perceived to contribute to officially valued forms of economic activity, creating a formality bias. The illegibility of the informal sector is exacerbated under conditions of neoliberalism, as it often fails to conform to imperatives of productivism, forms of production in which paid employment is segregated from other aspects of life, with economic development and growth seen to be their main objective. Seeing like a neoliberal state therefore results in the neglect of informal modes of production, which are not seen to carry value. The formality bias is also evident in relation to vocational education and training (VET), with productivist assumptions underpinning VET as an institution that is oriented towards the needs of industry. Global South VET systems are rigid, unresponsive to changing local labour markets, and unable to adapt to the needs of the fast-changing informal sector. VET policy and practice utilised by international development agencies and individuals, as well as by national governments, has largely ignored or denigrated the informal sector. In this chapter, we try to challenge the view that the informal sector holds little value, showing the range of ways young people make a living in and beyond it and the role that education and training usefully plays or could play in supporting these endeavors. If scholarship is to assist in making education and training systems more responsive to the needs of the informal sector, this will require a rethink of dominant ways of theorizing and researching learning for livelihoods. There remains a need for deeper theorization of the skills needed for living in the world in relation to oneself, to others, and to the environment while being sensitive to the development of inclusive and sustainable economies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/32361348
Primary Topic
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Youth, skills, and informal sectors in the Global South: theoretical and methodological lenses on learning and livelihoods

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
article

Youth, skills, and informal sectors in the Global South: theoretical and methodological lenses on learning and livelihoods

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

Education and training have largely failed to respond to the needs of those who generate livelihoods outside of the formal economy. Neglect of the informal sector is partly due to it eluding ‘legibility’: states generally only ‘see’ what can be measured and perceived to contribute to officially valued forms of economic activity, creating a formality bias. The illegibility of the informal sector is exacerbated under conditions of neoliberalism, as it often fails to conform to imperatives of productivism, forms of production in which paid employment is segregated from other aspects of life, with economic development and growth seen to be their main objective. Seeing like a neoliberal state therefore results in the neglect of informal modes of production, which are not seen to carry value. The formality bias is also evident in relation to vocational education and training (VET), with productivist assumptions underpinning VET as an institution that is oriented towards the needs of industry. Global South VET systems are rigid, unresponsive to changing local labour markets, and unable to adapt to the needs of the fast-changing informal sector. VET policy and practice utilised by international development agencies and individuals, as well as by national governments, has largely ignored or denigrated the informal sector. In this chapter, we try to challenge the view that the informal sector holds little value, showing the range of ways young people make a living in and beyond it and the role that education and training usefully plays or could play in supporting these endeavors. If scholarship is to assist in making education and training systems more responsive to the needs of the informal sector, this will require a rethink of dominant ways of theorizing and researching learning for livelihoods. There remains a need for deeper theorization of the skills needed for living in the world in relation to oneself, to others, and to the environment while being sensitive to the development of inclusive and sustainable economies.

Human Science Research Council SA
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.