Semaglutide versus placebo in individuals with poor weight loss after bariatric surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

A suboptimal clinical response after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is common and carries considerable health concerns. Here a double-blinded, randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled trial using semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly (BARI-STEP) recruited adult participants at least 1 year after gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy with a suboptimal clinical response, defined as less than 20% weight loss from surgery. This was an adjunct to lifestyle intervention with a 500-kcal daily energy deficit. The primary outcome was percentage weight loss after 68-week treatment on an intention-to-treat analysis. Seventy participants (mean (s.d.) age = 47.3 (10.3) years, 58 (82.9%) female and 12 (17.1%) male) were randomized to receive 2.4 mg semaglutide (n = 35) or placebo (n = 35). The intention-to-treat sample included 63 participants. Estimated change in mean (s.d.) percentage weight loss from baseline to week 68 was -18.0 (9.2) with semaglutide 2.4 mg (n = 34) versus +0.4 (7.0) with placebo (n = 29). The mean adjusted treatment difference in percentage body weight change for semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo was -19.18 (95% confidence interval -23.4 to -14.8; P < 0.001). Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the known safety and tolerability profile of semaglutide, with no new safety concerns for the post-bariatric population. There were eight serious AEs, one suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction and no treatment-related deaths. BARI-STEP demonstrates that in people with a suboptimal clinical response after MBS, semaglutide results in substantial and clinically significant body weight reduction along with improvement in metabolic parameters and quality of life, compared to placebo. These findings suggest that semaglutide 2.4 mg is a safe and effective treatment option for this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05073835 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Medicine
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04416-4
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Semaglutide versus placebo in individuals with poor weight loss after bariatric surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Ritwika Mallik, Mohamed Elkalaawy, Nausheen Hamid, C Magee et al.
Nature Medicine
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Semaglutide versus placebo in individuals with poor weight loss after bariatric surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Ritwika Mallik, Mohamed Elkalaawy, Nausheen Hamid, C Magee, Friedrich C. Jassil, JOHN LOY, Haris Markakis, Helen Kingett, Marco Adamo, A Jenkinson, Kalpana Devalia, Rachel L. Batterham, Alanna Brown, Andrea Pucci, C Stanley, David Boniface, Benjamin Norton, Tapiwa Ruwona, Janine Makaronidis, Jessica Mok, Samuel J. Dicken, Victoria Reuven, Sulmaaz Qamar
article en

Abstract

A suboptimal clinical response after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is common and carries considerable health concerns. Here a double-blinded, randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled trial using semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly (BARI-STEP) recruited adult participants at least 1 year after gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy with a suboptimal clinical response, defined as less than 20% weight loss from surgery. This was an adjunct to lifestyle intervention with a 500-kcal daily energy deficit. The primary outcome was percentage weight loss after 68-week treatment on an intention-to-treat analysis. Seventy participants (mean (s.d.) age = 47.3 (10.3) years, 58 (82.9%) female and 12 (17.1%) male) were randomized to receive 2.4 mg semaglutide (n = 35) or placebo (n = 35). The intention-to-treat sample included 63 participants. Estimated change in mean (s.d.) percentage weight loss from baseline to week 68 was -18.0 (9.2) with semaglutide 2.4 mg (n = 34) versus +0.4 (7.0) with placebo (n = 29). The mean adjusted treatment difference in percentage body weight change for semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo was -19.18 (95% confidence interval -23.4 to -14.8; P < 0.001). Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the known safety and tolerability profile of semaglutide, with no new safety concerns for the post-bariatric population. There were eight serious AEs, one suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction and no treatment-related deaths. BARI-STEP demonstrates that in people with a suboptimal clinical response after MBS, semaglutide results in substantial and clinically significant body weight reduction along with improvement in metabolic parameters and quality of life, compared to placebo. These findings suggest that semaglutide 2.4 mg is a safe and effective treatment option for this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05073835 .

Nature Medicine
University College Hospital (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB), Homerton University Hospital (GB), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), The London College (GB), Ashford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Cleveland Clinic London (GB), Sports Surgery Clinic (IE), Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University College London (GB), Geneva College (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, ViiV Healthcare, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust, Society for Endocrinology, Novo Nordisk, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.