Chronotype and Psychiatric Disorders – An Updated Review

Abstract Purpose of Review Chronotype is increasingly recognized as relevant to a range of psychiatric conditions, but its clinical significance and mechanistic role remain poorly understood. This review summarizes recent evidence on chronotype and psychiatric disorders published since 2018, and highlights key developments in study design, measurement, and proposed pathways linking chronotype to mental health. Recent Findings Eveningness continues to show the strongest and most consistent associations with depressive disorders, including major depressive disorder and seasonal affective disorder. Supporting evidence linking eveningness to bipolar disorder, suicidality, and addictive behaviors has expanded, based on several longitudinal cohort studies. Findings for anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, personality disorders, and psychotic disorders remain more mixed, partly reflecting heterogeneity in samples and chronotype definitions. A small but increasing number of studies incorporate objective markers (e.g., actigraphy, dim-light melatonin onset) and intensive designs (e.g., ecological momentary assessment), allowing for more precise estimates of sleep–wake timing. However, these multimethod approaches remain limited, and findings across modalities are inconsistent. Summary Chronotype is robustly associated with multiple psychiatric outcomes, most notably depression, substance use, and aspects of bipolar disorder and suicidality. Despite more longitudinal and multimethod evidence, the literature remains dominated by cross-sectional designs and subjective measures that may conflate biological phase with behavioral or contextual factors. Future work should integrate behavioral, biological, and environmental data across time to determine whether chronotype reflects a causal influence, a vulnerability marker, or an epiphenomenon of psychopathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Sleep Medicine Reports
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40675-026-00377-9
Primary Topic
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chronotype and Psychiatric Disorders – An Updated Review

Liia Kivelä, Niki Antypa
Current Sleep Medicine Reports
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
article

Chronotype and Psychiatric Disorders – An Updated Review

Liia Kivelä, Niki Antypa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review Chronotype is increasingly recognized as relevant to a range of psychiatric conditions, but its clinical significance and mechanistic role remain poorly understood. This review summarizes recent evidence on chronotype and psychiatric disorders published since 2018, and highlights key developments in study design, measurement, and proposed pathways linking chronotype to mental health. Recent Findings Eveningness continues to show the strongest and most consistent associations with depressive disorders, including major depressive disorder and seasonal affective disorder. Supporting evidence linking eveningness to bipolar disorder, suicidality, and addictive behaviors has expanded, based on several longitudinal cohort studies. Findings for anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, personality disorders, and psychotic disorders remain more mixed, partly reflecting heterogeneity in samples and chronotype definitions. A small but increasing number of studies incorporate objective markers (e.g., actigraphy, dim-light melatonin onset) and intensive designs (e.g., ecological momentary assessment), allowing for more precise estimates of sleep–wake timing. However, these multimethod approaches remain limited, and findings across modalities are inconsistent. Summary Chronotype is robustly associated with multiple psychiatric outcomes, most notably depression, substance use, and aspects of bipolar disorder and suicidality. Despite more longitudinal and multimethod evidence, the literature remains dominated by cross-sectional designs and subjective measures that may conflate biological phase with behavioral or contextual factors. Future work should integrate behavioral, biological, and environmental data across time to determine whether chronotype reflects a causal influence, a vulnerability marker, or an epiphenomenon of psychopathology.

Current Sleep Medicine ReportsVol. 12(1)
Leiden University (NL), University of Twente (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.