Combating <scp>ESG</scp> Greenwashing Through <scp>AI</scp> Models: Evidence From Disaggregated <scp>AI</scp> Technologies, Mechanisms, and Thresholds

ABSTRACT This study examines how artificial intelligence language models influence corporate environmental, social, and governance greenwashing () behavior, utilizing panel data from Chinese listed firms spanning 2012–2022. We investigate the mechanisms, technological disaggregation, threshold dynamics, and contextual heterogeneity characterizing this relationship. Employing a large language model to construct refined measures of AI adoption, our empirical analysis yields four principal findings. First, AI language models reduce . Second, technological disaggregation demonstrates substantial heterogeneity across AI subfields: machine learning and planning‐decision systems exert the strongest constraining effects on , while other AI categories show limited influence. Third, mechanism analysis reveals that AI constrains through two primary transmission channels, workforce skill restructuring and firm performance enhancement. Fourth, threshold regression analysis reveals critical nonlinearities: the AI– GW ESG relationship exhibits structural shifts contingent upon environmental regulation intensity and green technology sophistication. Fifth, subsample analysis stratified by pollution intensity, ownership structure, and technological orientation shows that AI's deterrent effect intensifies among heavily polluting enterprises, non‐state‐owned firms, and technology‐intensive sectors—contexts where disclosure credibility faces maximum scrutiny and organizational absorptive capacity enables effective AI integration. These findings suggest that recognizing AI's potential for environmental governance requires coordinated policy interventions: promoting AI deployment in environmentally critical domains, strengthening regulatory frameworks that leverage AI's analytical capabilities, investing in complementary human capital and digital infrastructure, and designing differentiated support mechanisms calibrated to firm heterogeneity. Firms can leverage on Ai models to boost transparency and Accountability of ESG reporting. Regulators and policymakers can investigate developing guidelines on the usage of AI technology to curb ESG greenwashing and improve sustainable practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70689
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combating ESG Greenwashing Through AI Models: Evidence From Disaggregated AI Technologies, Mechanisms, and Thresholds

Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany, Abdulrahman Atllah Alharbi, Brahim Bergougui
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Combating ESG Greenwashing Through AI Models: Evidence From Disaggregated AI Technologies, Mechanisms, and Thresholds

Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany, Abdulrahman Atllah Alharbi, Brahim Bergougui
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines how artificial intelligence language models influence corporate environmental, social, and governance greenwashing () behavior, utilizing panel data from Chinese listed firms spanning 2012–2022. We investigate the mechanisms, technological disaggregation, threshold dynamics, and contextual heterogeneity characterizing this relationship. Employing a large language model to construct refined measures of AI adoption, our empirical analysis yields four principal findings. First, AI language models reduce . Second, technological disaggregation demonstrates substantial heterogeneity across AI subfields: machine learning and planning‐decision systems exert the strongest constraining effects on , while other AI categories show limited influence. Third, mechanism analysis reveals that AI constrains through two primary transmission channels, workforce skill restructuring and firm performance enhancement. Fourth, threshold regression analysis reveals critical nonlinearities: the AI– GW ESG relationship exhibits structural shifts contingent upon environmental regulation intensity and green technology sophistication. Fifth, subsample analysis stratified by pollution intensity, ownership structure, and technological orientation shows that AI's deterrent effect intensifies among heavily polluting enterprises, non‐state‐owned firms, and technology‐intensive sectors—contexts where disclosure credibility faces maximum scrutiny and organizational absorptive capacity enables effective AI integration. These findings suggest that recognizing AI's potential for environmental governance requires coordinated policy interventions: promoting AI deployment in environmentally critical domains, strengthening regulatory frameworks that leverage AI's analytical capabilities, investing in complementary human capital and digital infrastructure, and designing differentiated support mechanisms calibrated to firm heterogeneity. Firms can leverage on Ai models to boost transparency and Accountability of ESG reporting. Regulators and policymakers can investigate developing guidelines on the usage of AI technology to curb ESG greenwashing and improve sustainable practices.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Taif University (SA), National Higher School of Statistics and Applied Economy (DZ), Qatar University (QA), International Institute of Social History (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.