Testing the utility of terrestrial laser scanning for fuel hazard assessments in temperate forests and woodlands of south-eastern Australia

Abstract Background Fire managers routinely assess fuels to predict fire behavior and assess the efficacy of fuel treatments. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) has the potential to provide a new source of detailed field data that can be interrogated to characterize fuel. This study examined the potential for integrating phase-shift TLS data into fuel hazard assessments in temperate south-eastern Australia by comparing measures of fuel properties and hazard scores from a manual “extended” method (an extension of an operationally implemented fuel hazard assessment) with those from a “TLS-plus” method (phase-shift TLS data plus select manual field measures). The two methods were tested in 42 plots of mature eucalypt forest or woodland across a broad landscape. Results The TLS-plus method led to higher estimates of mean cover for near-surface and elevated fuel (14 and 21% more, respectively), which resulted in fuel hazard scores up to 3 levels higher (on a scale of 1 to 5) than the extended method. The magnitude difference in cover estimates between the TLS-plus and extended method was most strongly related to plot-specific differences in vegetation cover rather than landscape variations in vegetation composition and structure. Conclusions This study indicates that phase-shift TLS has only limited utility for assessing fuel hazard in structurally complex native temperate forests as it needs to be supported by many in-field measures to interpret fuel hazard. Furthermore, higher cover estimates produced by the TLS-plus method will elevate predictions of fire behavior compared to the extended method under the same vegetation conditions (i.e., faster rates of spread, higher flame heights). These higher estimates are partially due to systematic bias introduced by the inclusion of coarse fuel by the TLS-plus method that is not included with the extended method. This study indicates that phase-shift TLS has limited utility for assessing fuel hazard in structurally complex native temperate forests as it needs to be supported by many in-field measures to interpret fuel hazard. Beyond fuel hazard assessment, TLS technology has the potential to provide more quantitative and sophisticated measures of fuel that will likely make it a trusted source of data for fire managers, especially for evaluating fuel management actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Ecology
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-026-00508-1
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the utility of terrestrial laser scanning for fuel hazard assessments in temperate forests and woodlands of south-eastern Australia

Bianca J. Pickering, Jane G. Cawson, Lauren T. Bennett, LO Wallace et al.
Fire Ecology
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Testing the utility of terrestrial laser scanning for fuel hazard assessments in temperate forests and woodlands of south-eastern Australia

Bianca J. Pickering, Jane G. Cawson, Lauren T. Bennett, LO Wallace, Chris Medlin, Samuel Hillman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Fire managers routinely assess fuels to predict fire behavior and assess the efficacy of fuel treatments. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) has the potential to provide a new source of detailed field data that can be interrogated to characterize fuel. This study examined the potential for integrating phase-shift TLS data into fuel hazard assessments in temperate south-eastern Australia by comparing measures of fuel properties and hazard scores from a manual “extended” method (an extension of an operationally implemented fuel hazard assessment) with those from a “TLS-plus” method (phase-shift TLS data plus select manual field measures). The two methods were tested in 42 plots of mature eucalypt forest or woodland across a broad landscape. Results The TLS-plus method led to higher estimates of mean cover for near-surface and elevated fuel (14 and 21% more, respectively), which resulted in fuel hazard scores up to 3 levels higher (on a scale of 1 to 5) than the extended method. The magnitude difference in cover estimates between the TLS-plus and extended method was most strongly related to plot-specific differences in vegetation cover rather than landscape variations in vegetation composition and structure. Conclusions This study indicates that phase-shift TLS has only limited utility for assessing fuel hazard in structurally complex native temperate forests as it needs to be supported by many in-field measures to interpret fuel hazard. Furthermore, higher cover estimates produced by the TLS-plus method will elevate predictions of fire behavior compared to the extended method under the same vegetation conditions (i.e., faster rates of spread, higher flame heights). These higher estimates are partially due to systematic bias introduced by the inclusion of coarse fuel by the TLS-plus method that is not included with the extended method. This study indicates that phase-shift TLS has limited utility for assessing fuel hazard in structurally complex native temperate forests as it needs to be supported by many in-field measures to interpret fuel hazard. Beyond fuel hazard assessment, TLS technology has the potential to provide more quantitative and sophisticated measures of fuel that will likely make it a trusted source of data for fire managers, especially for evaluating fuel management actions.

Fire Ecology
Planetary Science Institute (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Government of Victoria (AU)
University of Melbourne
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.