Learning curve for the abdominal procedure in total robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with simultaneous cervical approach: an initial experience

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is increasingly being implemented; however, the feasibility and learning process of total RAMIE using robotic approaches for thoracic and abdominal phases remain to be fully evaluated, particularly with a dual-docking technique enabling simultaneous cervical and abdominal approaches. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 50 consecutive patients who underwent total RAMIE with retrosternal gastric conduit reconstruction and cervical anastomosis at a single institution between September 2024 and August 2025. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of abdominal operative time was used to assess the learning curve. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the phases. RESULTS: CUSUM analysis identified three phases: phases I (patients 1-6, learning phase), II (7-18, competence phase), and III (19-50, proficiency phase). Median abdominal operative time decreased from 139 min (124-154) in phase I to 104 min (80-137) and 87 min (66-146) in phases II and III, respectively (P < 0.001). Initially, this procedure was applied to cStage I patients without abdominal nodal involvement, and was gradually expanded to advanced disease. The number of harvested abdominal lymph nodes was 15 (6-27) in phases I and II and 17 (6-26) in phase III. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2) occurred in 14% of patients, with no abdominal procedure-related morbidity observed. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural proficiency for the abdominal operative procedure was achieved in approximately 18 patients, after which operative efficiency improved without compromising oncologic thoroughness or patient safety. Total RAMIE with a two-team approach can be safely implemented in centers with experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-026-03852-w
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning curve for the abdominal procedure in total robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with simultaneous cervical approach: an initial experience

Yuki Ushimaru, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Hisateru Komatsu, Yasunori Masuike et al.
BMC Surgery
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Learning curve for the abdominal procedure in total robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with simultaneous cervical approach: an initial experience

Yuki Ushimaru, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Hisateru Komatsu, Yasunori Masuike, Toshinori Sueda, Masahiko Kubo, Kei Yamamoto, Masaaki Miyo, Norihiro Matsuura, Ryota Mori, Kunihito Gotoh, Yasunari Fukuda, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Masatoshi Kitakaze, Takashi Kanemura, Yoshinori Kagawa, Hiroshi Miyata, Shogo Kobayashi, Takahito Sugase
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is increasingly being implemented; however, the feasibility and learning process of total RAMIE using robotic approaches for thoracic and abdominal phases remain to be fully evaluated, particularly with a dual-docking technique enabling simultaneous cervical and abdominal approaches. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 50 consecutive patients who underwent total RAMIE with retrosternal gastric conduit reconstruction and cervical anastomosis at a single institution between September 2024 and August 2025. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of abdominal operative time was used to assess the learning curve. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the phases. RESULTS: CUSUM analysis identified three phases: phases I (patients 1-6, learning phase), II (7-18, competence phase), and III (19-50, proficiency phase). Median abdominal operative time decreased from 139 min (124-154) in phase I to 104 min (80-137) and 87 min (66-146) in phases II and III, respectively (P < 0.001). Initially, this procedure was applied to cStage I patients without abdominal nodal involvement, and was gradually expanded to advanced disease. The number of harvested abdominal lymph nodes was 15 (6-27) in phases I and II and 17 (6-26) in phase III. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2) occurred in 14% of patients, with no abdominal procedure-related morbidity observed. CONCLUSIONS: Procedural proficiency for the abdominal operative procedure was achieved in approximately 18 patients, after which operative efficiency improved without compromising oncologic thoroughness or patient safety. Total RAMIE with a two-team approach can be safely implemented in centers with experience.

BMC Surgery
Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP), Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.