Stuttering and social change: moving towards a critical disability studies approach in South Africa

The past few decades have seen significant growth in the field of disability studies. Through the application of a disability studies framework, international and South African researchers have addressed and challenged the marginalization and discrimination of disabled individuals. However, the focus has primarily been on individuals who are physically disabled and not communication impairment such as stuttering. Stuttering has received limited attention within disability studies in South Africa. In this chapter, the authors use the key findings of the first author's doctoral study as a case study to discuss and describe the oppression and discrimination people who stutter commonly encounter at different levels of society (i.e., the family, religious communities, spaces of education and employment, and societal norms of South African masculinities). The authors proceed to discuss the implications of the study's findings for policy, legislation, and intervention in South Africa. The authors argue that the study of disability, including stuttering in South Africa, must be examined through an intersectional lens, and particularly in low-income and racialized communities. The authors specifically advocate for social change at different levels of South African society, which they argue is only possible through a critical disability studies agenda, as this approach not only removes focus and responsibility of stuttering from the person who stutters and places it onto societal systems and ideologies that oppress and discriminate against people in South Africa who stutter. It also gives attention to how disabling experiences intersect with identity markers, such as race, culture, religion, and gender.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/32361951
Primary Topic
Stuttering Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stuttering and social change: moving towards a critical disability studies approach in South Africa

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Stuttering Research and Treatment
article

Stuttering and social change: moving towards a critical disability studies approach in South Africa

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

The past few decades have seen significant growth in the field of disability studies. Through the application of a disability studies framework, international and South African researchers have addressed and challenged the marginalization and discrimination of disabled individuals. However, the focus has primarily been on individuals who are physically disabled and not communication impairment such as stuttering. Stuttering has received limited attention within disability studies in South Africa. In this chapter, the authors use the key findings of the first author's doctoral study as a case study to discuss and describe the oppression and discrimination people who stutter commonly encounter at different levels of society (i.e., the family, religious communities, spaces of education and employment, and societal norms of South African masculinities). The authors proceed to discuss the implications of the study's findings for policy, legislation, and intervention in South Africa. The authors argue that the study of disability, including stuttering in South Africa, must be examined through an intersectional lens, and particularly in low-income and racialized communities. The authors specifically advocate for social change at different levels of South African society, which they argue is only possible through a critical disability studies agenda, as this approach not only removes focus and responsibility of stuttering from the person who stutters and places it onto societal systems and ideologies that oppress and discriminate against people in South Africa who stutter. It also gives attention to how disabling experiences intersect with identity markers, such as race, culture, religion, and gender.

Human Science Research Council SA
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Stuttering Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.