Effect of menstrual cups on vaginal health, reproductive tract and urogenital infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The menstrual cup is a device inserted into the vagina during menstruation to collect blood. Evidence of its effect on the vaginal microbiome and associations with laboratory-confirmed infections is limited. We compiled existing information to assess associations between menstrual cups and reproductive tract infections (RTIs), sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and the vaginal microbiome. METHODS: We searched four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Global Health, and Scopus, from inception to January 23, 2026) for trials or observational studies reporting on menstrual cup use and laboratory-confirmed RTIs, STIs and the vaginal microbiome. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for trials and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies. Outcomes of interest between cup-users and users of alternative menstrual products (non-cup users) were compared using prevalence ratios (PR). Meta-analyses were conducted using fixed-effects models to generate pooled estimates. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024559595. FINDINGS: = 0.0%, 3 continents). One trial showed an association between menstrual cups and HSV-2 of 0.71 (aPR, 95% CI 0.50-1.01, p = 0.057, n = 1451). Optimal vaginal community state type-1 (CST-I) was more likely among cup users compared to non-cup users (PR 1.18, 1.10-1.27, p < 0.0001, n = 2639, 5 studies in Kenya and Europe). No increased infection risks were noted among menstrual cup users across the infections evaluated. Main limitations included the low number and quality of existing studies. INTERPRETATION: Menstrual cups reduced the risk of STIs in Kenya. For bacterial vaginosis, the association was consistent with a protective effect and supportive for a healthy vaginal microbiome composition in studies from different geographies. These data strengthen evidence on the value of menstrual cups as a global multipurpose menstrual product solution. FUNDING: UK-Medical Research Council, Medical Research Foundation, USA-National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the Gates Foundation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EBioMedicine
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106307
Primary Topic
Menstrual Health and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of menstrual cups on vaginal health, reproductive tract and urogenital infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Penelope A. Phillips‐Howard, Stefan J. Green, Garazi Zulaika, Anna Maria van Eijk et al.
EBioMedicine
Menstrual Health and Disorders
article

Effect of menstrual cups on vaginal health, reproductive tract and urogenital infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Penelope A. Phillips‐Howard, Stefan J. Green, Garazi Zulaika, Anna Maria van Eijk, Alexandra Quinn-Savory, Linda Mason, Alys Skinner, Supriya D. Mehta
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The menstrual cup is a device inserted into the vagina during menstruation to collect blood. Evidence of its effect on the vaginal microbiome and associations with laboratory-confirmed infections is limited. We compiled existing information to assess associations between menstrual cups and reproductive tract infections (RTIs), sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and the vaginal microbiome. METHODS: We searched four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Global Health, and Scopus, from inception to January 23, 2026) for trials or observational studies reporting on menstrual cup use and laboratory-confirmed RTIs, STIs and the vaginal microbiome. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for trials and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies. Outcomes of interest between cup-users and users of alternative menstrual products (non-cup users) were compared using prevalence ratios (PR). Meta-analyses were conducted using fixed-effects models to generate pooled estimates. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024559595. FINDINGS: = 0.0%, 3 continents). One trial showed an association between menstrual cups and HSV-2 of 0.71 (aPR, 95% CI 0.50-1.01, p = 0.057, n = 1451). Optimal vaginal community state type-1 (CST-I) was more likely among cup users compared to non-cup users (PR 1.18, 1.10-1.27, p < 0.0001, n = 2639, 5 studies in Kenya and Europe). No increased infection risks were noted among menstrual cup users across the infections evaluated. Main limitations included the low number and quality of existing studies. INTERPRETATION: Menstrual cups reduced the risk of STIs in Kenya. For bacterial vaginosis, the association was consistent with a protective effect and supportive for a healthy vaginal microbiome composition in studies from different geographies. These data strengthen evidence on the value of menstrual cups as a global multipurpose menstrual product solution. FUNDING: UK-Medical Research Council, Medical Research Foundation, USA-National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the Gates Foundation.

EBioMedicineVol. 128
University of Liverpool (GB), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB), Rush University (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Medical Research Council, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Medical Research Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Menstrual Health and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.