Temporal and spatial patterns of γH2AX signaling in different human cells after exposure to X-rays and UV-C light

Abstract The phosphorylation of H2AX at serine 139 (γH2AX) is a marker of DNA damage response, well characterized after ionizing radiation (IR) exposure. In this work we compared γH2AX activation in different human cell lines exposed to X-rays, up to 5 Gy, or UV-C light (below ionization threshold), up to 40 J/m 2 . We selected HeLa, Caco-2 and HaCaT cells as models with different origins and radiosensitivity, conventionally screened with the clonogenic assay. We integrated data from fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Results highlight that γH2AX spatial pattern is determined by the genotoxic agent: X-rays induce discrete, countable foci (associated with DNA double-strand breaks), while UV-C leads to pan-nuclear signal distributions. Instead, dose-response curves are strongly dependent on the cell-line, showing linear or saturating trends, not attributable to the readout technique. After 5 Gy X-rays, γH2AX signal peaks within 1 hour. The residual intensity at 24 hours is compatible with the control for all cell lines; however, cells show different clonogenic survival fractions at 7 days. The kinetics of γH2AX positive cells following 20 J/m 2 UV-C exposure is completely different, with a slower accumulation and persistent signaling from viable cells (not restricted to the S-phase) up to 24 hours, but with a loss of clonogenic potential in the long-term. These findings emphasize that γH2AX marker may be considered as a functional sensor of DNA damage response rather than a marker of specific DNA lesions, and that both radiation quality and cellular context must be considered for its correct interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-026-01220-z
Primary Topic
DNA Repair Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal and spatial patterns of γH2AX signaling in different human cells after exposure to X-rays and UV-C light

Ornella Cazzalini, Paola Perucca, A. Mentana, Ombretta Iaria et al.
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
DNA Repair Mechanisms
article

Temporal and spatial patterns of γH2AX signaling in different human cells after exposure to X-rays and UV-C light

Ornella Cazzalini, Paola Perucca, A. Mentana, Ombretta Iaria, Paola Tabarelli de Fatis, Isabella Guardamagna, Daniele Parodi, Gilles Ivaldi, Leonardo Lonati, Anna Tricarico, Cecilia Riani, Andrea Previtali, Rossella Semerano, Giulia Peterlin, Giorgio Baiocco
article en

Abstract

Abstract The phosphorylation of H2AX at serine 139 (γH2AX) is a marker of DNA damage response, well characterized after ionizing radiation (IR) exposure. In this work we compared γH2AX activation in different human cell lines exposed to X-rays, up to 5 Gy, or UV-C light (below ionization threshold), up to 40 J/m 2 . We selected HeLa, Caco-2 and HaCaT cells as models with different origins and radiosensitivity, conventionally screened with the clonogenic assay. We integrated data from fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Results highlight that γH2AX spatial pattern is determined by the genotoxic agent: X-rays induce discrete, countable foci (associated with DNA double-strand breaks), while UV-C leads to pan-nuclear signal distributions. Instead, dose-response curves are strongly dependent on the cell-line, showing linear or saturating trends, not attributable to the readout technique. After 5 Gy X-rays, γH2AX signal peaks within 1 hour. The residual intensity at 24 hours is compatible with the control for all cell lines; however, cells show different clonogenic survival fractions at 7 days. The kinetics of γH2AX positive cells following 20 J/m 2 UV-C exposure is completely different, with a slower accumulation and persistent signaling from viable cells (not restricted to the S-phase) up to 24 hours, but with a loss of clonogenic potential in the long-term. These findings emphasize that γH2AX marker may be considered as a functional sensor of DNA damage response rather than a marker of specific DNA lesions, and that both radiation quality and cellular context must be considered for its correct interpretation.

Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
University of Pavia (IT), Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT)
Università degli Studi di Pavia
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
DNA Repair Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.