Community health worker-led versus facility-based type 2 diabetes care in rural Lesotho: a cluster-randomized trial within the ComBaCaL cohort study

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes poses a growing public health burden in low- and middle-income countries, where major gaps in access to chronic care persist. Task-shifting to Community Health Workers (CHWs) and the use of digital clinical decision support systems may bridge these gaps. Randomized trials evaluating CHW-led care models in which CHWs initiate, titrate, and monitor first-line diabetes treatment are lacking. METHODS: , all with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the trial. In intervention villages, CHWs - guided by a tablet-based clinical decision support system - provided care, including initiation and monitoring of metformin, atorvastatin and aspirin. In control villages, participants were referred to facility-based care. The primary analysis included participants with uncomplicated and uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (fasting glucose ≥7 mmol/l) on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 12 months. RESULTS: From 13 May 2023 to 31 January 2024, 5'785 cohort participants were screened, 252 (4·4%) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, and 103 (51 control, 52 intervention) included in the primary analysis (73·8% female, mean age 62·3 ± 12·8 years, mean HbA1c 7·2 ± 1·4%). At 12 months, HbA1c was 7·1 ± 1·9% in the control arm and 6·5 ± 1·3% in the intervention arm (adjusted mean difference -0·46%, 95%CI -1·14 to 0·22). Engagement in care was higher in the intervention arm. No relevant difference in safety outcomes was observed. CONCLUSIONS: CHW-led, clinical decision support system-assisted management of type 2 diabetes, including first-line drug prescription, may improve engagement in care and glycaemic control in rural low-resource settings. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05743387.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-04943-4
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community health worker-led versus facility-based type 2 diabetes care in rural Lesotho: a cluster-randomized trial within the ComBaCaL cohort study

Niklaus Daniel Labhardt, Mosa Tlahali, Fabian Raeber, Felix Gerber et al.
BMC Medicine
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Community health worker-led versus facility-based type 2 diabetes care in rural Lesotho: a cluster-randomized trial within the ComBaCaL cohort study

Niklaus Daniel Labhardt, Mosa Tlahali, Fabian Raeber, Felix Gerber, Irene Ayakaka, Kevin Kindler, Eleonora Seelig, Giuliana Sanchez-Samaniego, Mamakhala Chitja, Madavida Mphunyane, Manthabiseng Molulela, Mamoronts’ane Pauline Sematle, Retsélisitsoe Makabateng, Dave Brian Basler, Thesar Tahirsylaj, Sesale Masike, Malitaba Litaba, Manthati Mofokeng, Mota Mota, Iliana Esquivel-Valdés, Frédérique Chammartin, Alain Amstutz, Elis Belen Saavedra, Lebohang Sao, Makhebe Khomolishoele, Ravi Gupta, Matumaole Bane, Pauline Grimm, Thabo Ishmael Lejone
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes poses a growing public health burden in low- and middle-income countries, where major gaps in access to chronic care persist. Task-shifting to Community Health Workers (CHWs) and the use of digital clinical decision support systems may bridge these gaps. Randomized trials evaluating CHW-led care models in which CHWs initiate, titrate, and monitor first-line diabetes treatment are lacking. METHODS: , all with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the trial. In intervention villages, CHWs - guided by a tablet-based clinical decision support system - provided care, including initiation and monitoring of metformin, atorvastatin and aspirin. In control villages, participants were referred to facility-based care. The primary analysis included participants with uncomplicated and uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (fasting glucose ≥7 mmol/l) on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 12 months. RESULTS: From 13 May 2023 to 31 January 2024, 5'785 cohort participants were screened, 252 (4·4%) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, and 103 (51 control, 52 intervention) included in the primary analysis (73·8% female, mean age 62·3 ± 12·8 years, mean HbA1c 7·2 ± 1·4%). At 12 months, HbA1c was 7·1 ± 1·9% in the control arm and 6·5 ± 1·3% in the intervention arm (adjusted mean difference -0·46%, 95%CI -1·14 to 0·22). Engagement in care was higher in the intervention arm. No relevant difference in safety outcomes was observed. CONCLUSIONS: CHW-led, clinical decision support system-assisted management of type 2 diabetes, including first-line drug prescription, may improve engagement in care and glycaemic control in rural low-resource settings. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05743387.

BMC Medicine
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Oslo (NO), University of Basel (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), University of Bristol (GB), Felix Platter-Hospital (CH), Ministry of Health (LS), Kantonsspital Aarau (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, World Diabetes Foundation, Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.