Diversification, supplier selection, and order allocation under yield risks and strategic rivalry

This article examines supply-base configuration, supplier selection, and order allocation under supply risk and downstream rivalry. We develop a Cournot duopoly model in which two firms sell partially substitutable products and procure a critical input from two unreliable suppliers with asymmetric cost-risk profiles and correlated yield risks. We formulate a two-stage game: firms first choose their supply bases either endogenously or under a one-sided sourcing-flexibility structure and then allocate orders across selected suppliers. We derive closed-form, supplier-specific sourcing thresholds that quantify the marginal revenue gain from adding either supplier to an otherwise sole-sourced supply base. These thresholds vary systematically with supplier heterogeneity, yield correlation, the rival’s sourcing strategy, and competition intensity. In the endogenous sourcing game, supply-base choices are structurally independent of strategic rivalry—which affects only equilibrium order allocations—and the unique equilibrium takes the form of either mutual dual-sourcing or mutual sole-sourcing from the same supplier. Yet mutual dual-sourcing can be Pareto-dominated by distinct-supplier sole-sourcing. This Prisoner’s Dilemma arises only when yield correlation exceeds an explicit cutoff that declines with competition intensity. We also identify conditions under which the classical cost-based supplier-selection rule fails: above a critical correlation threshold, firms may optimally sole-source from the supplier with the higher effective cost because it is more reliable, and that equilibrium is Pareto-optimal. Under one-sided sourcing flexibility, when the rival is committed to sole-sourcing, both the sourcing threshold for the locked-in supplier and the correlation cutoff for supplier-selection reversal decline, strengthening the flexible firm’s incentive to sole-source from the other supplier. Finally, we show how the extent of firms’ supply-base overlap shapes strategic interaction and equilibrium order allocation under correlated yield risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Production and Operations Management
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478261453193
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diversification, supplier selection, and order allocation under yield risks and strategic rivalry

Arda Yenipazarli
Production and Operations Management
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

Diversification, supplier selection, and order allocation under yield risks and strategic rivalry

Arda Yenipazarli
article en

Abstract

This article examines supply-base configuration, supplier selection, and order allocation under supply risk and downstream rivalry. We develop a Cournot duopoly model in which two firms sell partially substitutable products and procure a critical input from two unreliable suppliers with asymmetric cost-risk profiles and correlated yield risks. We formulate a two-stage game: firms first choose their supply bases either endogenously or under a one-sided sourcing-flexibility structure and then allocate orders across selected suppliers. We derive closed-form, supplier-specific sourcing thresholds that quantify the marginal revenue gain from adding either supplier to an otherwise sole-sourced supply base. These thresholds vary systematically with supplier heterogeneity, yield correlation, the rival’s sourcing strategy, and competition intensity. In the endogenous sourcing game, supply-base choices are structurally independent of strategic rivalry—which affects only equilibrium order allocations—and the unique equilibrium takes the form of either mutual dual-sourcing or mutual sole-sourcing from the same supplier. Yet mutual dual-sourcing can be Pareto-dominated by distinct-supplier sole-sourcing. This Prisoner’s Dilemma arises only when yield correlation exceeds an explicit cutoff that declines with competition intensity. We also identify conditions under which the classical cost-based supplier-selection rule fails: above a critical correlation threshold, firms may optimally sole-source from the supplier with the higher effective cost because it is more reliable, and that equilibrium is Pareto-optimal. Under one-sided sourcing flexibility, when the rival is committed to sole-sourcing, both the sourcing threshold for the locked-in supplier and the correlation cutoff for supplier-selection reversal decline, strengthening the flexible firm’s incentive to sole-source from the other supplier. Finally, we show how the extent of firms’ supply-base overlap shapes strategic interaction and equilibrium order allocation under correlated yield risks.

Production and Operations Management
Georgia Southern University (US)
Parker College of Business, Georgia Southern University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.