Advances in fire severity assessment in forest ecosystems: remote sensing metrics with physical-basis versus spectral indices

Abstract Wildfires are becoming more frequent and severe in Mediterranean ecosystems, underscoring the urgent need for forest managers to rely on rapid and reliable methodologies to map fire-induced impacts and support post-fire management efforts. This study evaluates the accuracy and transferability of conventional spectral indices and physically-based remote sensing metrics, both retrieved from pre- and/or post-fire Sentinel-2 Level-2A scenes, for assessing photointerpreted fire severity (n = 646) through high-resolution satellite imagery (SPOT 6/7). The study sites are forest ecosystems located across wide environmental gradients and affected by four large wildfires (> 10,000 ha) that occurred in Spain during summer 2022. The physically-based metrics included the ratio of the fractional vegetation cover (FCOVER ratio) retrieved from the inversion of radiative transfer models (RTMs) and the canopy fraction burned (CFB) retrieved from multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis (MESMA). The calculated spectral indices were the dNBR, RBR, and the recently-proposed dNBR-EVI. A Random Forest classification algorithm was implemented to estimate categorized fire ecological impact levels (low, moderate and high) in a fivefold nested cross-validation approach from physically-based metrics and spectral indices. Findings highlighted the enhanced effectiveness of physically-based metrics, along with the dNBR-EVI index, as compared to conventional spectral indices in classifying fire severity across broadleaf and conifer forests, as well as with pooled data from both forest types. Particularly, the CFB (overall accuracy = 84.40%; Kappa = 0.77) minimized the underestimation of the high-severity class and showed high accuracy in classifying moderate fire severity, a category where traditional spectral indices showed significant limitations. The findings underscore the potential value of physically-based metrics and new spectral indices combined with photointerpretation of high-resolution satellite and aerial imagery as a rapid, scalable, and ecologically relevant approach to fire severity assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forestry Research
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-026-02072-5
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances in fire severity assessment in forest ecosystems: remote sensing metrics with physical-basis versus spectral indices

Alfonso Fernández–Manso, David Beltrán-Marcos, L. Calvo, José Manuel Fernández‐Guisuraga
Journal of Forestry Research
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Advances in fire severity assessment in forest ecosystems: remote sensing metrics with physical-basis versus spectral indices

Alfonso Fernández–Manso, David Beltrán-Marcos, L. Calvo, José Manuel Fernández‐Guisuraga
article en

Abstract

Abstract Wildfires are becoming more frequent and severe in Mediterranean ecosystems, underscoring the urgent need for forest managers to rely on rapid and reliable methodologies to map fire-induced impacts and support post-fire management efforts. This study evaluates the accuracy and transferability of conventional spectral indices and physically-based remote sensing metrics, both retrieved from pre- and/or post-fire Sentinel-2 Level-2A scenes, for assessing photointerpreted fire severity (n = 646) through high-resolution satellite imagery (SPOT 6/7). The study sites are forest ecosystems located across wide environmental gradients and affected by four large wildfires (> 10,000 ha) that occurred in Spain during summer 2022. The physically-based metrics included the ratio of the fractional vegetation cover (FCOVER ratio) retrieved from the inversion of radiative transfer models (RTMs) and the canopy fraction burned (CFB) retrieved from multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis (MESMA). The calculated spectral indices were the dNBR, RBR, and the recently-proposed dNBR-EVI. A Random Forest classification algorithm was implemented to estimate categorized fire ecological impact levels (low, moderate and high) in a fivefold nested cross-validation approach from physically-based metrics and spectral indices. Findings highlighted the enhanced effectiveness of physically-based metrics, along with the dNBR-EVI index, as compared to conventional spectral indices in classifying fire severity across broadleaf and conifer forests, as well as with pooled data from both forest types. Particularly, the CFB (overall accuracy = 84.40%; Kappa = 0.77) minimized the underestimation of the high-severity class and showed high accuracy in classifying moderate fire severity, a category where traditional spectral indices showed significant limitations. The findings underscore the potential value of physically-based metrics and new spectral indices combined with photointerpretation of high-resolution satellite and aerial imagery as a rapid, scalable, and ecologically relevant approach to fire severity assessment.

Journal of Forestry ResearchVol. 37(1)
Universidad de León (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Universidad de León
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.