Mechanisms of the Interaction Behaviors of Asphalt Mastic–Mineral Interface Structures

The interfacial structure between adhesive and mineral constitutes a critical determinant of asphalt pavement durability and stability. Current research on interfacial interaction (adhesion and stripping) behavior, derived from the asphalt binder–mineral interfacial system, demonstrates systematic biases from actual asphalt mixtures where asphalt mastic serves as the functional adhesive medium. This study investigated two sets of two-phase interface structures: asphalt mastic–mineral and asphalt binder–mineral. Through systematic application of improved stripping rate test, pull-off tensile strength (POTS) characterization, and surface energy theory, differences in the interaction behavior between two sets of two-phase interface structures were identified, and the underlying mechanisms responsible for these differences were elucidated. The results demonstrated that the evaluation of interfacial properties using asphalt binder as the adhesive in asphalt mixtures exhibits significant systematic bias. Significant discrepancies (up to 58.7%) were observed in interfacial properties (stripping rate, POTS, and surface energy parameters) between the two sets of structures. Notably, the governing mechanisms by which hydrodynamic conditioning, asphalt modification, and mineral lithology influence the binder–mineral interface remain applicable to the mastic–mineral system. Crucially, the distinct interaction behaviors between these two interfacial systems arise primarily from filler incorporation, which exerts dual effects: positively, fillers induce colloidal structure reorganization in asphalt, enhancing interfacial intermolecular forces and adhesion property at the interface; negatively, fillers simultaneously amplify localized stress concentration and elevate water affinity within the interface, thereby reducing POTS and water-induced damage resistance. This study elucidates the differences in interaction mechanisms between mastic–mineral and binder–mineral interfaces. The findings provide insights into the interaction behaviors of asphalt mixture interface structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmcee7.mteng-22388
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanisms of the Interaction Behaviors of Asphalt Mastic–Mineral Interface Structures

Cheng Wan, Li Y, Kangzhi Zhao, Yuanyuan Meng et al.
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
article

Mechanisms of the Interaction Behaviors of Asphalt Mastic–Mineral Interface Structures

Cheng Wan, Li Y, Kangzhi Zhao, Yuanyuan Meng, Tao Shen, Peng Lin, Zhaojie Chen
article en

Abstract

The interfacial structure between adhesive and mineral constitutes a critical determinant of asphalt pavement durability and stability. Current research on interfacial interaction (adhesion and stripping) behavior, derived from the asphalt binder–mineral interfacial system, demonstrates systematic biases from actual asphalt mixtures where asphalt mastic serves as the functional adhesive medium. This study investigated two sets of two-phase interface structures: asphalt mastic–mineral and asphalt binder–mineral. Through systematic application of improved stripping rate test, pull-off tensile strength (POTS) characterization, and surface energy theory, differences in the interaction behavior between two sets of two-phase interface structures were identified, and the underlying mechanisms responsible for these differences were elucidated. The results demonstrated that the evaluation of interfacial properties using asphalt binder as the adhesive in asphalt mixtures exhibits significant systematic bias. Significant discrepancies (up to 58.7%) were observed in interfacial properties (stripping rate, POTS, and surface energy parameters) between the two sets of structures. Notably, the governing mechanisms by which hydrodynamic conditioning, asphalt modification, and mineral lithology influence the binder–mineral interface remain applicable to the mastic–mineral system. Crucially, the distinct interaction behaviors between these two interfacial systems arise primarily from filler incorporation, which exerts dual effects: positively, fillers induce colloidal structure reorganization in asphalt, enhancing interfacial intermolecular forces and adhesion property at the interface; negatively, fillers simultaneously amplify localized stress concentration and elevate water affinity within the interface, thereby reducing POTS and water-induced damage resistance. This study elucidates the differences in interaction mechanisms between mastic–mineral and binder–mineral interfaces. The findings provide insights into the interaction behaviors of asphalt mixture interface structure.

Journal of Materials in Civil EngineeringVol. 38(8)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Guangzhou Maritime College (CN), South China University of Technology (CN), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.