A second-order meta-analysis of interventions and their effectiveness in STEMM education: effects on motivational, affective, and attitudinal outcomes

Abstract Background The STEMM sector is increasingly vital, with a growing demand for skilled professionals. Beyond cognitive skills, non-cognitive factors such as motivation, affect, and attitudes have a significant influence on STEMM performance and aspirations. To gain an overview of the field of research, a second-order meta-analysis was conducted on the effectiveness of interventions on non-cognitive outcomes in STEMM education. A systematic search (2000–2023) identified 6664 review studies, from which 42 meta-analyses containing 64 meta-analytic effect sizes were included. These encompassed 1903 primary studies, covering both K-12 and higher education contexts. The interventions were categorized by the targeted outcome, intervention method, and targeted STEMM discipline. Results Mathematics was the most frequently studied subject, and common interventions included applications of educational technology and student-centered instruction. The most studied outcomes were attitudes towards STEMM and affective factors, such as mathematics anxiety and satisfaction. Overall, interventions showed a significant positive effect on non-cognitive outcomes ( d = 0.42, 95% CI [0.35, 0.50], p < .001), indicating improved motivation, attitudes, or reduced anxiety toward STEMM. Effectiveness did not differ significantly across outcome types or intervention methods, although mathematics and general STEM studies showed slightly smaller effects. We also found substantial variability in the meta-analytic effects. Notably, gaps in the literature were identified. Affective states such as boredom and enjoyment were rarely addressed, and out-of-school contexts were underrepresented. Conclusion This highlights the need for more comprehensive and diverse meta-analyses. Nonetheless, student-centered teaching, games, and technology-based methods appear promising for enhancing non-cognitive outcomes in STEMM education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of STEM Education
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-026-00619-w
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A second-order meta-analysis of interventions and their effectiveness in STEMM education: effects on motivational, affective, and attitudinal outcomes

Fabian Heller, Albert Ziegler, Charlotte Popp, Heidrun Stoeger
International Journal of STEM Education
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

A second-order meta-analysis of interventions and their effectiveness in STEMM education: effects on motivational, affective, and attitudinal outcomes

Fabian Heller, Albert Ziegler, Charlotte Popp, Heidrun Stoeger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The STEMM sector is increasingly vital, with a growing demand for skilled professionals. Beyond cognitive skills, non-cognitive factors such as motivation, affect, and attitudes have a significant influence on STEMM performance and aspirations. To gain an overview of the field of research, a second-order meta-analysis was conducted on the effectiveness of interventions on non-cognitive outcomes in STEMM education. A systematic search (2000–2023) identified 6664 review studies, from which 42 meta-analyses containing 64 meta-analytic effect sizes were included. These encompassed 1903 primary studies, covering both K-12 and higher education contexts. The interventions were categorized by the targeted outcome, intervention method, and targeted STEMM discipline. Results Mathematics was the most frequently studied subject, and common interventions included applications of educational technology and student-centered instruction. The most studied outcomes were attitudes towards STEMM and affective factors, such as mathematics anxiety and satisfaction. Overall, interventions showed a significant positive effect on non-cognitive outcomes ( d = 0.42, 95% CI [0.35, 0.50], p < .001), indicating improved motivation, attitudes, or reduced anxiety toward STEMM. Effectiveness did not differ significantly across outcome types or intervention methods, although mathematics and general STEM studies showed slightly smaller effects. We also found substantial variability in the meta-analytic effects. Notably, gaps in the literature were identified. Affective states such as boredom and enjoyment were rarely addressed, and out-of-school contexts were underrepresented. Conclusion This highlights the need for more comprehensive and diverse meta-analyses. Nonetheless, student-centered teaching, games, and technology-based methods appear promising for enhancing non-cognitive outcomes in STEMM education.

International Journal of STEM EducationVol. 13(1)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University of Regensburg (DE)
Universität Regensburg
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.