Lamprophyre Zircon Geochronology and Pyrite–Arsenopyrite S-Fe Isotopes: Implications for Magmatic Mineralization at the Jinshan Gold Deposit, Western Qinling Metallogenic Belt

The lamprophyre dikes and multi-generational pyrite and arsenopyrite developed in the Jinshan gold deposit in the West Qinling metallogenic belt provide critical evidence for understanding the role of mantle-derived magmatism in gold mineralization processes. In this study, we conducted zircon U-Pb dating of lamprophyre to constrain the timing of magmatic activity and the mineralization age, and performed EMPA and LA-ICP-MS analyses on sulfides from the main metallogenic stage (Py II–III, Apy II–III) and lamprophyre-hosted pyrite (Py L) to constrain the formation conditions and metal sources of the Jinshan deposit. The results show that the mantle-derived magmatism represented by lamprophyre yields an age of 206 ± 2 Ma, which provides a lower-limit constraint on the timing of gold mineralization, corresponding to the subduction-to-extension transition period in the region. Stage II mineralization occurred at 270–320 °C with logƒS2 of −9 to −5, dominantly as Au-HS complexes, indicating medium-temperature hydrothermal conditions with low sulfur fugacity, consistent with microscopic mineral assemblages and thermodynamic simulations. Systematic δ34S variations reveal: stage II values (9.24–5‰) indicate granitic/Devonian sedimentary sources; Py L values (2.19–3.6‰) reflect mantle contributions; stage III signatures (−2.3–1.93‰) record late meteoric water mixing. Complementary δ56Fe data show that Py II (0.2–0.3‰) and Py L (0.58–0.68‰) preserve magmatic fingerprints, while negative values of Py III (−2.29 to −0.71‰) document increasing sedimentary Fe incorporation. Combined with geochronology, S-Fe isotopes, and physicochemical constraints, we propose that the Jinshan gold deposit formed in a tectonic setting transitioning from compression to extension during the Late Indosinian (ca. 237–201 Ma). Mineralization was initiated by the partial melting of the metasomatized mantle, where hydrous magmas efficiently extracted Au and volatiles. These components ascended through transcrustal faults, with Au partitioning into exsolved fluids that precipitated gold through immiscibility and boiling in secondary structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosciences
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences16060208
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lamprophyre Zircon Geochronology and Pyrite–Arsenopyrite S-Fe Isotopes: Implications for Magmatic Mineralization at the Jinshan Gold Deposit, Western Qinling Metallogenic Belt

Hang Li, Zhongkai Xue, Kang Yan, Li Chen et al.
Geosciences
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Lamprophyre Zircon Geochronology and Pyrite–Arsenopyrite S-Fe Isotopes: Implications for Magmatic Mineralization at the Jinshan Gold Deposit, Western Qinling Metallogenic Belt

Hang Li, Zhongkai Xue, Kang Yan, Li Chen, Xutao Yang, Haomin Guo, Haiyang Wang, Jianxiang Luo, Cheng Ma
article en

Abstract

The lamprophyre dikes and multi-generational pyrite and arsenopyrite developed in the Jinshan gold deposit in the West Qinling metallogenic belt provide critical evidence for understanding the role of mantle-derived magmatism in gold mineralization processes. In this study, we conducted zircon U-Pb dating of lamprophyre to constrain the timing of magmatic activity and the mineralization age, and performed EMPA and LA-ICP-MS analyses on sulfides from the main metallogenic stage (Py II–III, Apy II–III) and lamprophyre-hosted pyrite (Py L) to constrain the formation conditions and metal sources of the Jinshan deposit. The results show that the mantle-derived magmatism represented by lamprophyre yields an age of 206 ± 2 Ma, which provides a lower-limit constraint on the timing of gold mineralization, corresponding to the subduction-to-extension transition period in the region. Stage II mineralization occurred at 270–320 °C with logƒS2 of −9 to −5, dominantly as Au-HS complexes, indicating medium-temperature hydrothermal conditions with low sulfur fugacity, consistent with microscopic mineral assemblages and thermodynamic simulations. Systematic δ34S variations reveal: stage II values (9.24–5‰) indicate granitic/Devonian sedimentary sources; Py L values (2.19–3.6‰) reflect mantle contributions; stage III signatures (−2.3–1.93‰) record late meteoric water mixing. Complementary δ56Fe data show that Py II (0.2–0.3‰) and Py L (0.58–0.68‰) preserve magmatic fingerprints, while negative values of Py III (−2.29 to −0.71‰) document increasing sedimentary Fe incorporation. Combined with geochronology, S-Fe isotopes, and physicochemical constraints, we propose that the Jinshan gold deposit formed in a tectonic setting transitioning from compression to extension during the Late Indosinian (ca. 237–201 Ma). Mineralization was initiated by the partial melting of the metasomatized mantle, where hydrous magmas efficiently extracted Au and volatiles. These components ascended through transcrustal faults, with Au partitioning into exsolved fluids that precipitated gold through immiscibility and boiling in secondary structures.

GeosciencesVol. 16(6)
Longyan University (CN), China Geological Survey (CN)
China Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.