Sub-National SDG Progress and Spatial Inequality: A Composite Index Framework for Multi-Level Governance

Despite extensive global progress monitoring under the 2030 Agenda, existing Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) assessment frameworks remain structurally blind to within-country distributional disparities. This study addresses this gap by developing a methodologically transparent composite SDG index for multi-level governance assessment, applying it to 218 Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS 2) regions across the European Union over the period 2015–2022 (1744 region-year observations). In this context, the term “region-year observations” refers strictly to the balanced panel data structure, which is calculated by observing 218 distinct sub-national regions continuously over an 8-year period (218 regions × 8 years The index aggregates four dimensions—social, economic, educational, and institutional—using min-max normalization. The analysis yields three main results: (1) Spatial econometric analysis reveals strong, persistent positive spatial autocorrelation, with high-performing clusters concentrated in Northern and Western Europe and lagging clusters in Eastern and Southern peripheries. (2) A spatial error model identifies institutional governance quality as a consistent statistical predictor of sub-national SDG performance. The significance of the spatial error parameter (λ = 0.497) suggests that unobservable institutional and geographical common shocks systematically link neighboring regions. (3) Cluster analysis further distinguishes four regional archetypes: Disadvantaged, Leaders, Educated, and Transitional. These findings underscore the need for spatially aware SDG monitoring infrastructure and investment in institutional capacity as prerequisites for equitable governance, as integrating spatial dependencies is crucial to prevent national averages from masking severe regional developmental traps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115226
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sub-National SDG Progress and Spatial Inequality: A Composite Index Framework for Multi-Level Governance

Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, Hasan Tutar
Sustainability
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Sub-National SDG Progress and Spatial Inequality: A Composite Index Framework for Multi-Level Governance

Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, Hasan Tutar
article en

Abstract

Despite extensive global progress monitoring under the 2030 Agenda, existing Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) assessment frameworks remain structurally blind to within-country distributional disparities. This study addresses this gap by developing a methodologically transparent composite SDG index for multi-level governance assessment, applying it to 218 Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS 2) regions across the European Union over the period 2015–2022 (1744 region-year observations). In this context, the term “region-year observations” refers strictly to the balanced panel data structure, which is calculated by observing 218 distinct sub-national regions continuously over an 8-year period (218 regions × 8 years The index aggregates four dimensions—social, economic, educational, and institutional—using min-max normalization. The analysis yields three main results: (1) Spatial econometric analysis reveals strong, persistent positive spatial autocorrelation, with high-performing clusters concentrated in Northern and Western Europe and lagging clusters in Eastern and Southern peripheries. (2) A spatial error model identifies institutional governance quality as a consistent statistical predictor of sub-national SDG performance. The significance of the spatial error parameter (λ = 0.497) suggests that unobservable institutional and geographical common shocks systematically link neighboring regions. (3) Cluster analysis further distinguishes four regional archetypes: Disadvantaged, Leaders, Educated, and Transitional. These findings underscore the need for spatially aware SDG monitoring infrastructure and investment in institutional capacity as prerequisites for equitable governance, as integrating spatial dependencies is crucial to prevent national averages from masking severe regional developmental traps.

SustainabilityVol. 18(11)
National Technical University of Athens (GR), Azerbaijan State University of Economics (AZ), Baku Engineering University (AZ), Beykent University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.