Harmonization of Health Data Governance, Oversight, and Policy: Reimagining Stewardship

The Pan-Canadian Health Data Charter advocates for new legal institutions, that would empower organizations to steward health data for future use. We propose three potential legal mechanisms to realize this vision: (i) data stewards as fiduciaries, (ii) licensed data stewards, and (iii) licensed data trusts. These mechanisms would enable representative decision-makers acting on behalf of affected communities and publics to make binding choices about whether proposed health information uses respect applicable norms. This would help to foster public trust in health sector use of information. It would also enable data stewards to base their decisions on data re-use upon actionable feedback from affected populations regarding their preferences in balancing competing norms, which these institutions would produce. Our proposals hope to move the literature beyond narrow debates about the benefits of increasing or reducing regulation, towards an actionable vision of adaptive data governance in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare Management Forum
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704261450227
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harmonization of Health Data Governance, Oversight, and Policy: Reimagining Stewardship

Alexander Bernier, Bartha M. Knoppers
Healthcare Management Forum
Public Health Policies and Education
article

Harmonization of Health Data Governance, Oversight, and Policy: Reimagining Stewardship

Alexander Bernier, Bartha M. Knoppers
article en

Abstract

The Pan-Canadian Health Data Charter advocates for new legal institutions, that would empower organizations to steward health data for future use. We propose three potential legal mechanisms to realize this vision: (i) data stewards as fiduciaries, (ii) licensed data stewards, and (iii) licensed data trusts. These mechanisms would enable representative decision-makers acting on behalf of affected communities and publics to make binding choices about whether proposed health information uses respect applicable norms. This would help to foster public trust in health sector use of information. It would also enable data stewards to base their decisions on data re-use upon actionable feedback from affected populations regarding their preferences in balancing competing norms, which these institutions would produce. Our proposals hope to move the literature beyond narrow debates about the benefits of increasing or reducing regulation, towards an actionable vision of adaptive data governance in practice.

Healthcare Management Forum
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Toronto (CA), McGill University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Public Health Policies and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.