Awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of predatory journals among medical students in the western region of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey

The rise in predatory journals poses a significant risk to academic integrity, particularly for inexperienced researchers. This research aimed to evaluate awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of predatory journals in the western region of Saudi Arabia. This cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and May 2024 using an anonymous, self-administered, online validated questionnaire distributed to medical students in their clinical years in the western region of Saudi Arabia. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and associations between sociodemographic factors and knowledge of predatory journals were assessed utilizing chi-square and Fisher exact tests; all analyses were unadjusted. A total of 405 medical students participated in the study. Most participants (72.6%) regularly participated in faculty-mentored research activities, and over half (51.9%) published research in scientific journals. The primary reason for conducting this research was institution/program requirements (84.7%). Participation in faculty-mentored research and prior publication in scientific journals were strongly associated with predatory journal awareness (P < .001). Important factors for choosing a journal for publication were indexing in the major database (54.8%), rapid publication (48.9%), and a high journal impact factor (36.0%). Most participants (62.2%) had heard the term "predatory journal," with common sources being friends/colleagues (34.1%); only 54.3% reported knowing how to identify potentially predatory journals. Medical students in the western region of Saudi Arabia demonstrated moderate awareness of predatory journals, with gaps in knowledge regarding identifying characteristics. These findings underscore the need for targeted educational initiatives, including workshops and mentorship programs, to enhance understanding and promote ethical research practices. Improving awareness of predatory journals is essential for protecting academic integrity and fostering high-quality scientific contributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000049005
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of predatory journals among medical students in the western region of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey

Ahmed M. Alzahrani, Ahmed Bashawyah, Hassan A. Ahmed, Mohammed Barnawi et al.
Medicine
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of predatory journals among medical students in the western region of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey

Ahmed M. Alzahrani, Ahmed Bashawyah, Hassan A. Ahmed, Mohammed Barnawi, Ramy Samargandi, Abdullah S. Algarni, Eid A. Almasoudi, Abubakr S. Alzwaihri, Abdullah M. Otayn, Khalid A. Alzahrani
article en

Abstract

The rise in predatory journals poses a significant risk to academic integrity, particularly for inexperienced researchers. This research aimed to evaluate awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of predatory journals in the western region of Saudi Arabia. This cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and May 2024 using an anonymous, self-administered, online validated questionnaire distributed to medical students in their clinical years in the western region of Saudi Arabia. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and associations between sociodemographic factors and knowledge of predatory journals were assessed utilizing chi-square and Fisher exact tests; all analyses were unadjusted. A total of 405 medical students participated in the study. Most participants (72.6%) regularly participated in faculty-mentored research activities, and over half (51.9%) published research in scientific journals. The primary reason for conducting this research was institution/program requirements (84.7%). Participation in faculty-mentored research and prior publication in scientific journals were strongly associated with predatory journal awareness (P < .001). Important factors for choosing a journal for publication were indexing in the major database (54.8%), rapid publication (48.9%), and a high journal impact factor (36.0%). Most participants (62.2%) had heard the term "predatory journal," with common sources being friends/colleagues (34.1%); only 54.3% reported knowing how to identify potentially predatory journals. Medical students in the western region of Saudi Arabia demonstrated moderate awareness of predatory journals, with gaps in knowledge regarding identifying characteristics. These findings underscore the need for targeted educational initiatives, including workshops and mentorship programs, to enhance understanding and promote ethical research practices. Improving awareness of predatory journals is essential for protecting academic integrity and fostering high-quality scientific contributions.

MedicineVol. 105(21)
King Abdulaziz University (SA), University of Jeddah (SA), Al Amal Hospital Jeddah (SA), Armed Forces Hospital (SA), Security Forces Hospital (SA), North West Armed Forces Hospital (SA), King Fahad Hospital Jeddah (SA), Dammam Central Hospital (SA), Al Baha University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.