Influence of the use of an intraoperative image-guided alignment system on the refractive outcomes in subjects with preoperative astigmatism: a large comparative retrospective study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare the refractive outcomes in a large cohort with preoperative corneal astigmatism who underwent cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation assisted (study group) or no (control group) with an intraoperative image-guided cataract planning system (Callisto, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). METHODS: In this retrospective comparative database study, mean and centroid postoperative cylinder, mean absolute error (MAE) and the proportion of eyes with a prediction error (PE) within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D and ± 1.00 D (both in cylinder and spherical equivalent (SE)) were compared between both groups. These endpoints were also compared depending on the type of preoperative astigmatism, i.e. against the rule (ATR), oblique or with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism. RESULTS: In total, 31,176 cases were analyzed in this study. Mean (± standard deviation (SD)) postoperative cylinder was found to be significantly lower in the study group (0.419 ± 0.432 D) compared with the control group (0.443 ± 0.453 D, p < 0.001). This statistical difference was observed in eyes with ATR and oblique astigmatism when looking at subgroups. Postoperative centroid cylinder (mean @angle ± SD) was 0.042 @97° ± 0.600 D in the study group and 0.043 @100° ± 0.633 D in the control group. MAE in cylinder was significantly lower in the study group compared to the control group. A slight but significantly higher percentages (up to 3%) of eyes with a PE in cylinder within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D and 1.00 D were observed in the study group compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study showed that the use of CALLISTO surgical planning system can improve refractive outcomes after cataract surgery and toric IOL implantation in patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism, especially in terms of cylinder for ATR and oblique astigmatism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-026-04918-2
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of the use of an intraoperative image-guided alignment system on the refractive outcomes in subjects with preoperative astigmatism: a large comparative retrospective study

Julie M. Schallhorn, Inder Paul Singh, Luke Rebenitsch
BMC Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Influence of the use of an intraoperative image-guided alignment system on the refractive outcomes in subjects with preoperative astigmatism: a large comparative retrospective study

Julie M. Schallhorn, Inder Paul Singh, Luke Rebenitsch
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare the refractive outcomes in a large cohort with preoperative corneal astigmatism who underwent cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation assisted (study group) or no (control group) with an intraoperative image-guided cataract planning system (Callisto, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). METHODS: In this retrospective comparative database study, mean and centroid postoperative cylinder, mean absolute error (MAE) and the proportion of eyes with a prediction error (PE) within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D and ± 1.00 D (both in cylinder and spherical equivalent (SE)) were compared between both groups. These endpoints were also compared depending on the type of preoperative astigmatism, i.e. against the rule (ATR), oblique or with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism. RESULTS: In total, 31,176 cases were analyzed in this study. Mean (± standard deviation (SD)) postoperative cylinder was found to be significantly lower in the study group (0.419 ± 0.432 D) compared with the control group (0.443 ± 0.453 D, p < 0.001). This statistical difference was observed in eyes with ATR and oblique astigmatism when looking at subgroups. Postoperative centroid cylinder (mean @angle ± SD) was 0.042 @97° ± 0.600 D in the study group and 0.043 @100° ± 0.633 D in the control group. MAE in cylinder was significantly lower in the study group compared to the control group. A slight but significantly higher percentages (up to 3%) of eyes with a PE in cylinder within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D and 1.00 D were observed in the study group compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study showed that the use of CALLISTO surgical planning system can improve refractive outcomes after cataract surgery and toric IOL implantation in patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism, especially in terms of cylinder for ATR and oblique astigmatism.

BMC Ophthalmology
San Francisco Foundation (US), Hough Ear Institute (US), Clearside Biomedical (United States) (US), SC Johnson (United States) (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.