External validation of predictive models for prolonged postoperative ileus following colorectal resection

INTRODUCTION: Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is a frequent complication after colorectal surgery. Several prediction models have been proposed to estimate PPOI risk, but few have undergone external validation, limiting their generalizability and clinical usefulness. The primary aim of this study was to externally validate two predictive models for PPOI after colorectal resection; a secondary aim was to explore factors associated with PPOI in our cohort. METHODS: Data from all consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal resection in our department between 2019 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective database. Eligible criteria were age ≥ 18 years, elective colorectal resection, and ASA score I-III. Based on a recent systematic review, we selected the models by Hain et al. and Wolthuis et al. for external validation, as all required variables were available in our dataset. Model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and overall accuracy. An exploratory multivariable regression analysis was also performed to assess factors associated with PPOI. RESULTS: Among 200 patients undergoing colorectal resection, 43 (21.5%) developed PPOI. Both prediction models showed poor external performance. The Hain model had a C-statistic of 0.597 (95% CI 0.514-0.681) and the Wolthuis model a C-statistic of 0.589 (95% CI 0.501-0.677), with suboptimal calibration and limited overall accuracy. In secondary exploratory multivariable analyses, postoperative opioid use was associated with PPOI in both models. In the model excluding postoperative oral intake initiation and autonomous postoperative mobilization, splenic flexure mobilization was associated with lower odds of PPOI; in the fully adjusted model, delayed postoperative oral intake initiation was associated with PPOI. These exploratory local findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. CONCLUSIONS: External validation of two previously published PPOI prediction models demonstrated poor performance in this cohort, limiting their transportability to our setting. The secondary exploratory analysis identified potentially relevant postoperative factors, but these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Further research should prioritize harmonized PPOI definitions and robust multicentre validation of prediction models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-026-05152-4
Primary Topic
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External validation of predictive models for prolonged postoperative ileus following colorectal resection

C. Feo, Nicolò Fabbri, Martina Lucietto, Antonio Biondi et al.
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
article

External validation of predictive models for prolonged postoperative ileus following colorectal resection

C. Feo, Nicolò Fabbri, Martina Lucietto, Antonio Biondi, Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Antonio Pesce, Bruno Cirillo
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is a frequent complication after colorectal surgery. Several prediction models have been proposed to estimate PPOI risk, but few have undergone external validation, limiting their generalizability and clinical usefulness. The primary aim of this study was to externally validate two predictive models for PPOI after colorectal resection; a secondary aim was to explore factors associated with PPOI in our cohort. METHODS: Data from all consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal resection in our department between 2019 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective database. Eligible criteria were age ≥ 18 years, elective colorectal resection, and ASA score I-III. Based on a recent systematic review, we selected the models by Hain et al. and Wolthuis et al. for external validation, as all required variables were available in our dataset. Model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and overall accuracy. An exploratory multivariable regression analysis was also performed to assess factors associated with PPOI. RESULTS: Among 200 patients undergoing colorectal resection, 43 (21.5%) developed PPOI. Both prediction models showed poor external performance. The Hain model had a C-statistic of 0.597 (95% CI 0.514-0.681) and the Wolthuis model a C-statistic of 0.589 (95% CI 0.501-0.677), with suboptimal calibration and limited overall accuracy. In secondary exploratory multivariable analyses, postoperative opioid use was associated with PPOI in both models. In the model excluding postoperative oral intake initiation and autonomous postoperative mobilization, splenic flexure mobilization was associated with lower odds of PPOI; in the fully adjusted model, delayed postoperative oral intake initiation was associated with PPOI. These exploratory local findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. CONCLUSIONS: External validation of two previously published PPOI prediction models demonstrated poor performance in this cohort, limiting their transportability to our setting. The secondary exploratory analysis identified potentially relevant postoperative factors, but these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Further research should prioritize harmonized PPOI definitions and robust multicentre validation of prediction models.

International Journal of Colorectal Disease
University of Ferrara (IT), University of Catania (IT), Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Ferrara (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), Union des Industries Ferroviaires Européennes (BE), Universidad del Rosario (CO)
Università degli Studi di Ferrara
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.