Theory of mind, leisure reading, and reading comprehension in adulthood

Theory of mind, our understanding of our own and others' mental states, is related to leisure reading as well as reading comprehension. However, most work has been siloed by reading domain. Whereas research on leisure reading and theory of mind has been conducted mainly with adults using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes task (RMET), research on reading comprehension and theory of mind has been conducted mainly with children and a range of theory of mind tasks. This study integrates these lines of research in adults by examining the pathways among leisure reading, theory of mind, and reading comprehension using a comprehensive set of measures. Leisure reading included both inferred reading exposure (Author Recognition Test) and self-reported reading. We examined not only the RMET, but other theory of mind tasks-false belief, Strange Stories, the Animations task, and the four-item mentalizing index. Participants included 207 young adults (Mage = 19.26, SD = 1.13; 76% female). Participants were 74% White, 15% Black, 7% Asian, 3% Other, and < 1% American Indian or Alaska Native; 12% identified as Hispanic or Latino. Leisure reading was significantly related to theory of mind and theory of mind was significantly related to a standardized reading comprehension test, though relations differed across measurements. Controlling for covariates, theory of mind (RMET) mediated the relation between leisure reading (Author Recognition Test) and reading comprehension. The results suggest a model for how research on leisure reading, theory of mind, and reading comprehension may be integrated in future work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106589
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theory of mind, leisure reading, and reading comprehension in adulthood

Derek E. Montgomery, Virginia Tompkins, Xin Feng
Cognition
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Theory of mind, leisure reading, and reading comprehension in adulthood

Derek E. Montgomery, Virginia Tompkins, Xin Feng
article en

Abstract

Theory of mind, our understanding of our own and others' mental states, is related to leisure reading as well as reading comprehension. However, most work has been siloed by reading domain. Whereas research on leisure reading and theory of mind has been conducted mainly with adults using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes task (RMET), research on reading comprehension and theory of mind has been conducted mainly with children and a range of theory of mind tasks. This study integrates these lines of research in adults by examining the pathways among leisure reading, theory of mind, and reading comprehension using a comprehensive set of measures. Leisure reading included both inferred reading exposure (Author Recognition Test) and self-reported reading. We examined not only the RMET, but other theory of mind tasks-false belief, Strange Stories, the Animations task, and the four-item mentalizing index. Participants included 207 young adults (Mage = 19.26, SD = 1.13; 76% female). Participants were 74% White, 15% Black, 7% Asian, 3% Other, and < 1% American Indian or Alaska Native; 12% identified as Hispanic or Latino. Leisure reading was significantly related to theory of mind and theory of mind was significantly related to a standardized reading comprehension test, though relations differed across measurements. Controlling for covariates, theory of mind (RMET) mediated the relation between leisure reading (Author Recognition Test) and reading comprehension. The results suggest a model for how research on leisure reading, theory of mind, and reading comprehension may be integrated in future work.

CognitionVol. 274
Bradley University (US), The Ohio State University at Lima (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.