Assessing the performance of LPJmL-5 in simulating vegetation responses to normal and multi-year droughts

Abstract. Climate change is expected to increase the frequency and severity of Multi-Year Droughts (MYDs), but their impacts on vegetation remain poorly understood. While satellite records offer valuable insights, they only cover recent decades, limiting the number of MYDs available for analysis. The dynamic global vegetation model LPJmL-5 can simulate vegetation dynamics under varying climate conditions and over longer temporal scales than are typically available from satellite observations. However, its ability to capture vegetation responses to drought, including MYDs, has not yet been systematically evaluated against observation-based datasets. In this study, we benchmark LPJmL-5 against MODIS-derived gross primary production (GPP) to assess how well the model reproduces vegetation responses to drought. We find that LPJmL-5 captures the key temporal and spatial dynamics of drought-related GPP observed by MODIS, although notable differences remain. In particular, LPJmL-5 tends to overestimate vegetation response at the onset of MYDs and shows some rapid recovery behaviour, resulting in muted overall drought impacts. Vegetation responses also vary by type: drought dynamics in croplands are captured relatively well, whereas responses in boreal and temperate vegetation are underestimated in magnitude. These discrepancies appear to be linked to simplified model representations of vegetation stress and mortality, which limit long-term vegetation loss. Beyond drought conditions, LPJmL-5 reproduces absolute GPP values reasonably well in some regions, but performance declines in parts of the Southern Hemisphere and in cropland-dominated areas. This suggests that general GPP simulation performance is not necessarily linked to performance during drought conditions. Overall, this benchmarking highlights strengths and limitations in how LPJmL-5 represents vegetation responses to drought and provides a foundation for future studies of vegetation responses to multi-year droughts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth System Dynamics
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-607-2026
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the performance of LPJmL-5 in simulating vegetation responses to normal and multi-year droughts

Sandra Margrit Hauswirth, Hester Biemans, Denise Ruijsch, Niko Wanders
Earth System Dynamics
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
article

Assessing the performance of LPJmL-5 in simulating vegetation responses to normal and multi-year droughts

Sandra Margrit Hauswirth, Hester Biemans, Denise Ruijsch, Niko Wanders
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Climate change is expected to increase the frequency and severity of Multi-Year Droughts (MYDs), but their impacts on vegetation remain poorly understood. While satellite records offer valuable insights, they only cover recent decades, limiting the number of MYDs available for analysis. The dynamic global vegetation model LPJmL-5 can simulate vegetation dynamics under varying climate conditions and over longer temporal scales than are typically available from satellite observations. However, its ability to capture vegetation responses to drought, including MYDs, has not yet been systematically evaluated against observation-based datasets. In this study, we benchmark LPJmL-5 against MODIS-derived gross primary production (GPP) to assess how well the model reproduces vegetation responses to drought. We find that LPJmL-5 captures the key temporal and spatial dynamics of drought-related GPP observed by MODIS, although notable differences remain. In particular, LPJmL-5 tends to overestimate vegetation response at the onset of MYDs and shows some rapid recovery behaviour, resulting in muted overall drought impacts. Vegetation responses also vary by type: drought dynamics in croplands are captured relatively well, whereas responses in boreal and temperate vegetation are underestimated in magnitude. These discrepancies appear to be linked to simplified model representations of vegetation stress and mortality, which limit long-term vegetation loss. Beyond drought conditions, LPJmL-5 reproduces absolute GPP values reasonably well in some regions, but performance declines in parts of the Southern Hemisphere and in cropland-dominated areas. This suggests that general GPP simulation performance is not necessarily linked to performance during drought conditions. Overall, this benchmarking highlights strengths and limitations in how LPJmL-5 represents vegetation responses to drought and provides a foundation for future studies of vegetation responses to multi-year droughts.

Earth System DynamicsVol. 17(3)
Utrecht University (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
H2020 European Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.