A Structural Theory of Quantum Computational Advantage from Admissible Histories

We propose a structural framework for interpreting quantum computational advantage in terms of admissible continuation of configurations. In this framework, a quantum computation is described not only as a sequence of gates acting on a state vector but also as the organization of admissible histories whose phase contributions combine coherently in a manner related to sum-over-histories and path-integral formulations of quantum mechanics. We identify three structural features that are relevant to quantum advantage: the multiplicity of admissible histories, the degree of phase coherence among them, and the non-factorizable structure of continuation constraints corresponding to entanglement-like global dependence. To make these features explicit, we introduce the notion of effective coherent multiplicity, which measures the coherently usable portion of an admissible-history space before probability normalization. We then formulate a structural speedup conjecture: substantial quantum advantage requires not merely a large number of possible histories but scalable coherent multiplicity supported by non-factorizable constraints whose instability remains bounded. We also introduce a coherent-fiber criterion, which identifies phase-alignable families of histories selected by compact computational relations as a structural source of coherent amplification. This formulation does not replace standard complexity-theoretic measures such as circuit size, query complexity, or BQP membership. Rather, it provides a complementary structural language for relating those measures to interference, entanglement, decoherence, and the organization of computational history space. The framework clarifies, at a structural level, why raw branching alone is insufficient for speedup, why unstructured search yields only a limited advantage, and why problems with compact global regularities, such as Simon’s problem and period finding, can support stronger coherent amplification. The paper also discusses how the proposed quantities relate to standard notions, including success amplitudes, entanglement measures, tensor-network simulability, and fault-tolerance constraints. In this way, admissible-history structure is presented as a diagnostic viewpoint for understanding both the power and limitations of quantum computation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quantum Reports
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum8020049
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Structural Theory of Quantum Computational Advantage from Admissible Histories

Bin Li
Quantum Reports
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

A Structural Theory of Quantum Computational Advantage from Admissible Histories

Bin Li
article en

Abstract

We propose a structural framework for interpreting quantum computational advantage in terms of admissible continuation of configurations. In this framework, a quantum computation is described not only as a sequence of gates acting on a state vector but also as the organization of admissible histories whose phase contributions combine coherently in a manner related to sum-over-histories and path-integral formulations of quantum mechanics. We identify three structural features that are relevant to quantum advantage: the multiplicity of admissible histories, the degree of phase coherence among them, and the non-factorizable structure of continuation constraints corresponding to entanglement-like global dependence. To make these features explicit, we introduce the notion of effective coherent multiplicity, which measures the coherently usable portion of an admissible-history space before probability normalization. We then formulate a structural speedup conjecture: substantial quantum advantage requires not merely a large number of possible histories but scalable coherent multiplicity supported by non-factorizable constraints whose instability remains bounded. We also introduce a coherent-fiber criterion, which identifies phase-alignable families of histories selected by compact computational relations as a structural source of coherent amplification. This formulation does not replace standard complexity-theoretic measures such as circuit size, query complexity, or BQP membership. Rather, it provides a complementary structural language for relating those measures to interference, entanglement, decoherence, and the organization of computational history space. The framework clarifies, at a structural level, why raw branching alone is insufficient for speedup, why unstructured search yields only a limited advantage, and why problems with compact global regularities, such as Simon’s problem and period finding, can support stronger coherent amplification. The paper also discusses how the proposed quantities relate to standard notions, including success amplitudes, entanglement measures, tensor-network simulability, and fault-tolerance constraints. In this way, admissible-history structure is presented as a diagnostic viewpoint for understanding both the power and limitations of quantum computation.

Quantum ReportsVol. 8(2)
Silicon Labs (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.