Reliability and quality of cognitive impairment educational content on Douyin and Bilibili: A cross-sectional content analysis

This study aimed to evaluate the content characteristics, quality, and reliability of cognitive impairment educational videos on Douyin and Bilibili and examine whether video duration and user engagement are associated with information quality. This cross-sectional content analysis searched the Chinese domestic version of TikTok (Douyin; https://www.douyin.com/) and Bilibili (https://www.bilibili.com/) through their official web interfaces on March 12, 2026. Searches were performed in logged-out mode using the keyword "cognitive impairment" via a desktop browser. The first 150 results from each platform were screened, and 250 eligible videos were included (133 from Douyin and 117 from Bilibili). Video quality and reliability were evaluated with the Global Quality Score, modified DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria, and Video Information and Quality Index. Overall educational quality was moderate. Across both platforms, content focused primarily on clinical manifestations and treatment, whereas epidemiology, diagnosis, and prognosis were insufficiently covered. Douyin videos had significantly higher Global Quality Score, modified DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association, and Video Information and Quality Index scores than Bilibili videos (all P < .001), despite being substantially shorter. Videos uploaded by doctors or other health professionals showed the highest quality and reliability, whereas videos uploaded by individual users generated stronger engagement. Correlations between engagement indicators and quality scores were weak, indicating that popularity did not reliably reflect educational value. Cognitive impairment videos on Douyin and Bilibili showed substantial variability in quality and incomplete content coverage. Professional participation, clearer source disclosure, and platform-level governance may improve the accuracy and practical utility of short-video health education on cognitive impairment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048941
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and quality of cognitive impairment educational content on Douyin and Bilibili: A cross-sectional content analysis

Chunyan Chen, Ying Ao, Yike Liu, Jiamin Gao et al.
Medicine
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Reliability and quality of cognitive impairment educational content on Douyin and Bilibili: A cross-sectional content analysis

Chunyan Chen, Ying Ao, Yike Liu, Jiamin Gao, Xiaoxuan Fan, Haiyan Song, Ya Na, Yuzhang Liang, Yifeng Xie
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the content characteristics, quality, and reliability of cognitive impairment educational videos on Douyin and Bilibili and examine whether video duration and user engagement are associated with information quality. This cross-sectional content analysis searched the Chinese domestic version of TikTok (Douyin; https://www.douyin.com/) and Bilibili (https://www.bilibili.com/) through their official web interfaces on March 12, 2026. Searches were performed in logged-out mode using the keyword "cognitive impairment" via a desktop browser. The first 150 results from each platform were screened, and 250 eligible videos were included (133 from Douyin and 117 from Bilibili). Video quality and reliability were evaluated with the Global Quality Score, modified DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria, and Video Information and Quality Index. Overall educational quality was moderate. Across both platforms, content focused primarily on clinical manifestations and treatment, whereas epidemiology, diagnosis, and prognosis were insufficiently covered. Douyin videos had significantly higher Global Quality Score, modified DISCERN, Journal of the American Medical Association, and Video Information and Quality Index scores than Bilibili videos (all P < .001), despite being substantially shorter. Videos uploaded by doctors or other health professionals showed the highest quality and reliability, whereas videos uploaded by individual users generated stronger engagement. Correlations between engagement indicators and quality scores were weak, indicating that popularity did not reliably reflect educational value. Cognitive impairment videos on Douyin and Bilibili showed substantial variability in quality and incomplete content coverage. Professional participation, clearer source disclosure, and platform-level governance may improve the accuracy and practical utility of short-video health education on cognitive impairment.

MedicineVol. 105(21)
Hetao College (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.