Happiness and Well-Being as Clinical and Public Health Outcomes A Narrative Review and Eight-Pillar Integrative Framework for Prevention, Care and Hu man Flourishing

Abstract Background: Happiness and well-being have moved from the margins of philosophy and social policy into the centre of medical, clinical, occupational and public health research. A growing body of evidence links subjective well-being, life satisfaction, meaning, social connection and psychological flourishing with mental health, cardiovascular risk, healthy behaviours, resilience, health service quality, burnout prevention and recovery-oriented care. Yet clinical systems still tend to measure distress, impairment and disease more systematically than strengths, resources and flourishing. Aim: This article synthesises contemporary evidence on happiness and well-being as clinically relevant outcomes and proposes an eight-pillar integrative framework that can be used for prevention, assessment, intervention design and evaluation across health care, workplaces and community settings. Methods: A targeted narrative review was conducted across landmark theoretical contributions, measurement frameworks, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials, public health reports and global policy documents published up to May 2026. The synthesis privileges medical relevance, translational usefulness, methodological transparency and applicability to whole-person care. Results: The evidence supports a multidimensional understanding of well-being that includes hedonic, eudaimonic, relational, functional, physical, professional, financial and digital dimensions. Positive psychology interventions, mindfulness-based approaches, exercise, social connection, meaning-centred practices, sleep and lifestyle interventions, compassion training and organisational interventions show potential to improve well-being, although effect sizes vary and implementation quality remains decisive. In clinical contexts, well-being should be treated neither as a luxury nor as a replacement for diagnosis and treatment, but as a complementary outcome that strengthens prevention, adherence, recovery, workforce sustainability and patient-centred care. Conclusion: Happiness and well-being deserve a rigorous place in medical and clinical research. The proposed eight-pillar framework offers a pragmatic bridge between subjective experience, clinical prevention and public health strategy. Future research should prioritise longitudinal designs, culturally sensitive measures, equity, implementation science and clinically meaningful endpoints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20338219
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Happiness and Well-Being as Clinical and Public Health Outcomes A Narrative Review and Eight-Pillar Integrative Framework for Prevention, Care and Hu man Flourishing

Bonasa Alzuria Dr. Ignacio
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Happiness and Well-Being as Clinical and Public Health Outcomes A Narrative Review and Eight-Pillar Integrative Framework for Prevention, Care and Hu man Flourishing

Bonasa Alzuria Dr. Ignacio
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Happiness and well-being have moved from the margins of philosophy and social policy into the centre of medical, clinical, occupational and public health research. A growing body of evidence links subjective well-being, life satisfaction, meaning, social connection and psychological flourishing with mental health, cardiovascular risk, healthy behaviours, resilience, health service quality, burnout prevention and recovery-oriented care. Yet clinical systems still tend to measure distress, impairment and disease more systematically than strengths, resources and flourishing. Aim: This article synthesises contemporary evidence on happiness and well-being as clinically relevant outcomes and proposes an eight-pillar integrative framework that can be used for prevention, assessment, intervention design and evaluation across health care, workplaces and community settings. Methods: A targeted narrative review was conducted across landmark theoretical contributions, measurement frameworks, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials, public health reports and global policy documents published up to May 2026. The synthesis privileges medical relevance, translational usefulness, methodological transparency and applicability to whole-person care. Results: The evidence supports a multidimensional understanding of well-being that includes hedonic, eudaimonic, relational, functional, physical, professional, financial and digital dimensions. Positive psychology interventions, mindfulness-based approaches, exercise, social connection, meaning-centred practices, sleep and lifestyle interventions, compassion training and organisational interventions show potential to improve well-being, although effect sizes vary and implementation quality remains decisive. In clinical contexts, well-being should be treated neither as a luxury nor as a replacement for diagnosis and treatment, but as a complementary outcome that strengthens prevention, adherence, recovery, workforce sustainability and patient-centred care. Conclusion: Happiness and well-being deserve a rigorous place in medical and clinical research. The proposed eight-pillar framework offers a pragmatic bridge between subjective experience, clinical prevention and public health strategy. Future research should prioritise longitudinal designs, culturally sensitive measures, equity, implementation science and clinically meaningful endpoints.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Eli Lilly (Spain) (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.