Knowledge Quality (KQ) – Foundation, Strategy, and Protection

Most organizational dysfunction is not hidden. It is visible — and untouchable. This combined publication introduces Knowledge Quality (KQ): the first empirical quality standard for action-guiding knowledge, derived from the identification and operationalization of Passive Qualitative Disinformation (PQD) — the condition in which an organization loses awareness that its operative models are models, while those models continue to guide consequential action. The first paper (KQ – A New Approach to Knowledge Quality) develops the conceptual and diagnostic foundation: PQD as an empirical phenomenon, KQ as a domain-independent and scale-independent standard, and the diagnostic primitive that makes qualitative blind spots identifiable. The second paper (Disrupting Consulting: Wrong. Visible. Untouchable. The KQ Legitimacy Lever) develops the strategic implication: KQ as a standalone legitimacy lever that turns protected organizational dysfunction into an actionable, documented finding — without requiring a new framework, a culture program, or another assessment layer. The third paper (Protecting Knowledge Quality: Intellectual Property Architecture) provides a structured due diligence assessment of the KQ/PQD protection position: documented priority since 1997, copyright over the distinctive argumentative corpus, a trademark and certification mark architecture, a closed professional execution layer protected as trade secret, and the expansion topology beyond the consulting entry point. It maps the compound protection architecture across jurisdictions and addresses what it means for prospective strategic partners. The argument is cumulative. Read sequentially.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20342616
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge Quality (KQ) – Foundation, Strategy, and Protection

Thomas Glueck
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Knowledge Quality (KQ) – Foundation, Strategy, and Protection

Thomas Glueck
article en

Abstract

Most organizational dysfunction is not hidden. It is visible — and untouchable. This combined publication introduces Knowledge Quality (KQ): the first empirical quality standard for action-guiding knowledge, derived from the identification and operationalization of Passive Qualitative Disinformation (PQD) — the condition in which an organization loses awareness that its operative models are models, while those models continue to guide consequential action. The first paper (KQ – A New Approach to Knowledge Quality) develops the conceptual and diagnostic foundation: PQD as an empirical phenomenon, KQ as a domain-independent and scale-independent standard, and the diagnostic primitive that makes qualitative blind spots identifiable. The second paper (Disrupting Consulting: Wrong. Visible. Untouchable. The KQ Legitimacy Lever) develops the strategic implication: KQ as a standalone legitimacy lever that turns protected organizational dysfunction into an actionable, documented finding — without requiring a new framework, a culture program, or another assessment layer. The third paper (Protecting Knowledge Quality: Intellectual Property Architecture) provides a structured due diligence assessment of the KQ/PQD protection position: documented priority since 1997, copyright over the distinctive argumentative corpus, a trademark and certification mark architecture, a closed professional execution layer protected as trade secret, and the expansion topology beyond the consulting entry point. It maps the compound protection architecture across jurisdictions and addresses what it means for prospective strategic partners. The argument is cumulative. Read sequentially.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.