Machine Learning for Raman Spectroscopy Glioblastoma Classification

ABSTRACT This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of various computational models for glioblastoma cell classification using Raman spectroscopy data. We compare traditional machine learning methods such as support vector machines, boosting and random forests with more modern methods including convolutional neural networks, vision transformers and the broad learning system. We find that convolutional neural networks are the most successful model for this data set and perform best when some feature normalisation is performed but without preprocessing methods such as background drift removal. We also find that data augmentation did not improve performance which is contrary to other published work in the area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemometrics
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.70133
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning for Raman Spectroscopy Glioblastoma Classification

Jarek Maciaczyk, Donata Maciaczyk, Brendan McCane, Silke Neumann et al.
Journal of Chemometrics
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
article

Machine Learning for Raman Spectroscopy Glioblastoma Classification

Jarek Maciaczyk, Donata Maciaczyk, Brendan McCane, Silke Neumann, Sara J. Fraser‐Miller, Irsyaad Rijwan, Keith Gordon
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of various computational models for glioblastoma cell classification using Raman spectroscopy data. We compare traditional machine learning methods such as support vector machines, boosting and random forests with more modern methods including convolutional neural networks, vision transformers and the broad learning system. We find that convolutional neural networks are the most successful model for this data set and perform best when some feature normalisation is performed but without preprocessing methods such as background drift removal. We also find that data augmentation did not improve performance which is contrary to other published work in the area.

Journal of ChemometricsVol. 40(6)
Miltenyi Biotec (Germany) (DE), Flinders University (AU), University Hospital Bonn (DE), University of Otago (NZ)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.